Motion or amendment: Appointment of Executive Ministers and the Formation of an Executive
Motion or amendment by Mr Eóin Tennyson on .
- MLA
- Mr Eóin Tennyson
- Party at the time
- Alliance Party
- Date
- 26 May 2022
- Type
- Motion or amendment
- Business
- Motion · Private Members' Motion
- Heading
- Appointment of Executive Ministers and the Formation of an Executive
- Assembly identifier
- Document 374146
Read the official Assembly record Open Data source
Text
Appointment of Executive Ministers and the Formation of an Executive
That this Assembly supports the urgent appointment of Executive Ministers; calls for the formation of an Executive without further delay to ensure the democratic outcome of the election is respected; and further calls for immediate action to be taken by an incoming Executive to address the issues pressing down on the public, including the cost of living crisis, the challenges in our health system and other fundamental issues which demand immediate government attention.
83 words. Text as published by the Northern Ireland Assembly.
Also tabled by
Each MLA who tabled or co-signed this item has their own record:
- Dr Caoimhe Archibald – record
- Ms Kellie Armstrong – record
- Mr Danny Baker – record
- Mr John Blair – record
- Mr Cathal Boylan – record
- Ms Paula Bradshaw – record
- Miss Nicola Brogan – record
- Mr Patrick Brown – record
- Mr Pádraig Delargy – record
- Mr Stewart Dickson – record
- Mrs Linda Dillon – record
- Miss Jemma Dolan – record
- Mr Danny Donnelly – record
- Mr Mark Durkan – record
- Ms Sorcha Eastwood – record
- Ms Connie Egan – record
- Mrs Sinéad Ennis – record
- Mrs Ciara Ferguson – record
- Miss Órlaithí Flynn – record
- Mr Colm Gildernew – record
- Miss Deirdre Hargey – record
- Mr David Honeyford – record
- Ms Cara Hunter – record
- Mr Declan Kearney – record
- Ms Liz Kimmins – record
- Mrs Naomi Long – record
- Mr Declan McAleer – record
- Miss Nuala McAllister – record
- Mr Patsy McGlone – record
- Mr Colin McGrath – record
- Mr Philip McGuigan – record
- Mr Maolíosa McHugh – record
- Ms Sinéad McLaughlin – record
- Mr Justin McNulty – record
- Mr Peter McReynolds – record
- Mrs Cathy Mason – record
- Mr Nick Mathison – record
- Mr Andrew Muir – record
- Mr Conor Murphy – record
- Miss Áine Murphy – record
- Ms Kate Nicholl – record
- Ms Carál Ní Chuilín – record
- Mr John O'Dowd – record
- Dr Patricia O'Lynn – record
- Ms Michelle O'Neill – record
- Ms Aisling Reilly – record
- Mr Pat Sheehan – record
- Ms Emma Sheerin – record
Assessment
Jev’s structured answers met the documented threshold for “not qualifying”.
- Overall probability that the activity is being used to promote, exploit or escalate an identity-based controversy: 0.03 (qualifying needs at least 0.70; at or below 0.30 is not qualifying).
- None of the five culture-war criteria was met (each was below 0.60).
- No identity-based framing was identified (1.00).
- The overall probability was at or below the not-qualifying threshold.
This is an AI-generated assessment of the text, made against published criteria. It is not a finding of fact about the MLA or their intentions. The Assembly record itself is the fact.
Jev’s structured answers
| Question | Probability | Met? |
|---|---|---|
| Identity framing | 0.02 | No |
| Sectarian or communal antagonism | 0.02 | No |
| Cultural grievance politics | 0.02 | No |
| Dog-whistle messaging | 0.01 | No |
| Controversy escalation | 0.02 | No |
| Legitimate policy scrutiny | 0.58 | No |
| Overall judgement | 0.03 | At or below not-qualifying threshold |
| Option | Probability |
|---|---|
| No identity-based framing (chosen) | 1.00 |
| Reports or questions it | 0.00 |
| Criticises or condemns it | 0.00 |
| Adopts it | 0.00 |
| Subject | Probability |
|---|---|
| No identity-related subject | 0.99 |
| Constitutional question, Brexit, the Windsor Framework and sovereignty | 0.01 |
| Flags, emblems, symbols, names and memorials | 0.00 |
| Parades, bonfires and commemorations | 0.00 |
| Irish language, Ulster-Scots and language policy | 0.00 |
Assessed 21 October 2026 at 08:41 UTC by jev-1.13.0 (requested as typesafe/jev) under rubric 2026.10-r9, methodology 1.9. The text was identical to an already-assessed record, so the same answers were reused.
Disagree with this assessment?
Classifications can be challenged. A person reviews every challenge, and any change is recorded publicly above with its reason.