Search Assembly records

Every imported question, contribution and motion, with its classification. Unflagged, uncertain and not-yet-analysed records are all included so the analysis can be checked independently.

108,608 records match, page 3795 of 4345.

  1. Debate contribution: Northern Ireland Act 1998: Section 64(1)

    I have clearly laid out the time frame for when I intend to lay a Budget before the Assembly. I have set it out in a number of the debates that we have had on the Budget since the Assembly and the Executive were restored. Obviously, these are not ideal circumstances. I have been very upfront about that, but we have to…

    Not flagged

  2. Debate contribution: Northern Ireland Act 1998: Section 64(1)

    The Minister has not answered the question. What are the legal consequences of her flagrant breach of the statutory duty under section 64(1) to lay a Budget? What example is it to set our citizens if we say to them, "The Minister can defy the law, but you must obey the law that this Assembly made"?

    Not analysed

  3. Debate contribution: Northern Ireland Act 1998: Section 64(1)

    The Member will be aware of the challenges facing the Assembly and the Executive with the time frame for the Budget for the previous financial year and also for this financial year. He will also be aware that the same section of the 1998 Act requires that I lay a statement in the Assembly after I have been informed by…

    Not flagged

  4. Debate contribution: Integrated Schools: Fresh Start Funding

    I understand that the Member is referring to the £150 million of Fresh Start funding. Again, I cannot speak on behalf of the Education Minister, but I understand that the 10 integrated schools were part of the Department of Education's capital programme. As the Member will know, the Executive agreed to earmark funding…

    Not flagged

  5. Debate contribution: Integrated Schools: Fresh Start Funding

    Minister, you said that you are left dealing with the consequences of the removal of the ring fence, but one of the consequences is not that the Executive have to remove money. It is really important to nail that myth. A ring fence being removed does not remove the money from those schools. That was a decision made by…

    Not analysed

  6. Debate contribution: Integrated Schools: Fresh Start Funding

    The response to the question for written answer that the Member will have received will reflect the official correspondence that we received from Treasury about the financial package and any moneys that had been unring-fenced. That is the date in my response to which the Member is referring. I cannot answer for the…

    Not flagged

  7. Debate contribution: Barnett Consequentials: Spring Budget

    The financial package that accompanied the Executive's restoration was clear that, from 2024-25, any uplift to the Executive's DEL budget through the Barnett formula would attract a 24% needs-based factor. Therefore, it has to be applied to the consequential received in the spring Budget. As I said, I sought and have…

    Not flagged

  8. Debate contribution: Barnett Consequentials: Spring Budget

    The spring Budget announced by the Chancellor on 6 March 2024 provided £99·4 million of additional resource DEL Barnett consequentials for the Executive in 2024-25. That is based on the current Barnett formula, which will need to be updated to reflect the new 124% as part of the restoration package. I have sought and…

    Not flagged

  9. Debate contribution: Gender Budgeting

    As part of the Budget process for 2024-25, I have written to my Executive colleagues setting out the approach to our equality considerations. Going forward, I plan to engage fully with the Equality Commission on how we can improve equality considerations as part of that wider process. As I said, I want to fully…

    Not flagged

  10. Debate contribution: Gender Budgeting

    I am committed to ensuring that my Department follows best practice in relation to its section 75 duties, not only in considering the equality impacts of its own spending decisions but also in respect of the wider Budget process. The gender impact of Budget proposals should be captured as part of the equality impact…

    Not flagged

  11. Debate contribution: Non-teaching Staff Pay Awards

    At every stage of the process, my officials worked at pace to complete the review of the information and reach a judgement on whether it was sufficient to enable expenditure approval. Unfortunately, the review identified at several stages that the information provided to my Department contained significant errors and…

    Not flagged

  12. Debate contribution: Non-teaching Staff Pay Awards

    I have been involved in bilateral meetings with all of my Executive colleagues as part of the budgetary process, and we have discussed the various challenges that face each of the Departments and their Ministers. It would not be appropriate for me to go into the individual bids at this point, because there is a…

    Not flagged

  13. Debate contribution: Non-teaching Staff Pay Awards

    I assume that that will be a matter for the Education Minister. My Department has approved the business case and the expenditure for the implementation of the pay and grading review. It will obviously be for the Education Minister to take that forward and to ensure that the implementation of the proposed measures is…

    Not flagged

  14. Debate contribution: Non-teaching Staff Pay Awards

    I recognise the vital role of non-teaching staff and the crucial contribution that they make to the education of our children and young people. My Department provided expenditure approval for the implementation of the non-teaching staff pay and grading review on 3 April 2024. It is now for the Department of Education…

    Not flagged

  15. Debate contribution: Revenue-raising Schemes: Executive Consideration

    We are working through the Budget process, at the minute, so there is a good bit on the Department's plate, but it is something that I want to bring to the Executive in the near future. As part of the negotiations that we will have with Treasury about a future fiscal framework, it is important that we have an agreed…

    Not flagged

  16. Debate contribution: Revenue-raising Schemes: Executive Consideration

    The Secretary of State put forward a number of measures for consultation while the Executive were down. Departments will be in receipt of the responses to those in the next short while, and, certainly, I will consider the outworking of the consultation in respect of rates. As part of the consultation on the general…

    Not flagged

  17. Debate contribution: Revenue-raising Schemes: Executive Consideration

    I thank the Minister. The Fiscal Council and the Fiscal Commission conducted detailed analysis and presented several outcomes. Has the Minister discarded those? If so, what does she plan to do to cover the growing fiscal gap?

    Not analysed

  18. Debate contribution: Revenue-raising Schemes: Executive Consideration

    The Executive recognise the need for fiscal sustainability and, as part of a new fiscal framework, will want to look at all options to deliver efficiencies, generate revenue, enhance borrowing powers and examine fiscal devolution. The main revenue-raising measure that falls within my Department’s remit is the regional…

    Not flagged

  19. Debate contribution: Fujitsu: Public Procurement Contracts

    Obviously, there are legal issues in respect of the delivery of contracts. The position would be in respect of new contracts. I will write to the Member, outlining details on the specifics of the regulations on public procurement and contracts.

    Not flagged

Download all records matching these filters (up to 100,000 rows): CSV · JSON