Search Assembly records

Every imported question, contribution and motion, with its classification. Unflagged, uncertain and not-yet-analysed records are all included so the analysis can be checked independently.

108,300 records match, page 3828 of 4332.

  1. Debate contribution: Regulation (EU) 2023/2411: Applicability Motion

    I appreciate the Member's giving way. He and the Member from the Alliance Party mentioned the risk to dual market access. Given that the EU has brought forward an entirely new regulation, the divergence risk here comes not from the Assembly or, indeed, the UK Government but principally from Brussels. Given the…

    Not flagged

  2. Debate contribution: Regulation (EU) 2023/2411: Applicability Motion

    I thank the Member for giving way. Does he recognise that there is a distinct difference between non-agricultural GIs and agricultural GIs? Today's debate is not about the Comber spud. It is about non-agricultural GIs. It is important to put that on the record for clarity, rather than cascade different views.

    Not flagged

  3. Debate contribution: Regulation (EU) 2023/2411: Applicability Motion

    Thank you, Mr Speaker. I was unaware, happily listening to the debate. In answer to Mr Beattie's point, I will scrutinise a little bit of what is in the legislation, though we have had very little time to look at the detail. The detail is not mysterious or unknown to us. I will cover a little bit of the detail. We…

    Not flagged

  4. Debate contribution: Regulation (EU) 2023/2411: Applicability Motion

    There is one certainty with this legislation. If it were to be applied, you would discover that, under article 48, any Northern Ireland produce qualifying under it would not bear a Northern Ireland label; it would bear an EU label. That further illustrates the extent to which we have become captured by the EU. That is…

    Not flagged

  5. Debate contribution: Regulation (EU) 2023/2411: Applicability Motion

    I thank the Member for giving way. This intervention may add weight to the Member's argument, but he can make his own mind up about that. In Lisburn, there is a bakery, the owner of which has lambasted me for three weeks, because they cannot get a piece of machinery — a simple mixing bowl that costs £150 — for want of…

    Not flagged

  6. Debate contribution: Regulation (EU) 2023/2411: Applicability Motion

    I think that the Member has got me slightly wrong. There are 90 MLAs here. Every one of those 90 MLAs can look at this and take a view on how it works, but where is the in-depth scrutiny? With any other law that would apply to Northern Ireland, we would have people giving evidence to Committees to make sure that we…

    Not flagged

  7. Debate contribution: Regulation (EU) 2023/2411: Applicability Motion

    I thank the Member for giving way. This should not have come at such short notice, but there is a lot of information out there. I know that we were all busy during the St Patrick's Day weekend, but there is a lot of information out there, and this is not a huge deal, one way or the other; it is of medium-positive…

    Not flagged

  8. Debate contribution: Regulation (EU) 2023/2411: Applicability Motion

    Thank you. The Member is absolutely right that this did not sneak up on us. The Ulster Unionist Party MLA Steve Aiken raised it on the Floor twice over two weeks. He also raised it with the Windsor Framework Democratic Scrutiny Committee and TEO. The Member is, therefore, absolutely right that this did not sneak up on…

    Not flagged

  9. Debate contribution: Regulation (EU) 2023/2411: Applicability Motion

    I thank the Member for giving way. On that point, all Members were made aware of this on 21 February, when the Cabinet Office sent correspondence to the Committee that included the UK Government's explanatory memorandum. That was copied, through the Speaker, to all Departments. I think that the point that the Member…

    Not flagged

  10. Debate contribution: Regulation (EU) 2023/2411: Applicability Motion

    This debate on EU regulations on geographical indications for craft and industrial products had a starting point, and that starting point was Brexit, which was always going to be destabilising. It created customs posts in our ports, and it has created trade barriers. From that Brexit, we got the Northern Ireland…

    Not flagged

  11. Debate contribution: Regulation (EU) 2023/2411: Applicability Motion

    Does the Member not recognise that there are also people in Northern Ireland who want to ensure that we have democratic scrutiny of what comes before the Assembly and that it is therefore important that we have input into that as an integral part of the UK?

    Not flagged

  12. Debate contribution: Regulation (EU) 2023/2411: Applicability Motion

    Apologies, my voice is a little weak today — a bit like the DUP position on dual market access. A few short weeks ago, we welcomed the return of the institutions. The public were maybe not delighted but certainly relieved that we had people in this place making laws that would help to make their life better. However,…

    Not flagged

  13. Debate contribution: Regulation (EU) 2023/2411: Applicability Motion

    A Cheann Comhairle, just last week, the First Minister and deputy First Minister, along with other Ministers and you, were out in the US promoting the North as a place to invest and do business in. I congratulate them all on that work in what looked and sounded like successful engagements. Key to their message while…

    Not flagged

  14. Debate contribution: Regulation (EU) 2023/2411: Applicability Motion

    I appreciate the Member for being open to interventions and giving way. He mentioned Donegal tweed as an example and the UK Government being responsible for taking it off the shelves if it was not compliant. Would not that only be the case if it was non-compliant Donegal tweed? If it was Donegal tweed produced in a…

    Not flagged

  15. Debate contribution: Regulation (EU) 2023/2411: Applicability Motion

    Does the Member recognise that there is a democratic deficit in that certain Members' votes will not be counted equally to those of others when we vote on the motion?

    Not flagged

  16. Debate contribution: Regulation (EU) 2023/2411: Applicability Motion

    I thank the Member for giving way. He has made some important points about democracy and the issue of democratic consent. Does he agree that the greatest democratic deficit is the fact that hundreds of EU laws identified in annex 2 of the protocol are imposed on Northern Ireland, governing our manufacturing industry,…

    Not flagged

  17. Debate contribution: Regulation (EU) 2023/2411: Applicability Motion

    I am happy to debate the issue at length today with the Member. Since we are talking about ironies, does he think that it is ironic that the DUP has tabled an applicability motion that it is going to vote against?

    Not flagged

  18. Debate contribution: Regulation (EU) 2023/2411: Applicability Motion

    I beg to move At the outset, it is important to note that this is the first time that the Northern Ireland Assembly will vote on whether a new EU law should apply in Northern Ireland. That, in itself, Members, is a significant moment. Regardless of individual views that will be expressed in the debate, it is still…

    Not flagged

  19. Debate contribution: Parental Bereavement Leave (No. 2) Regulations (Northern Ireland) 2023

    • Mr Conor Murphy SF
    • Executive Committee Business
    • As a minister

    I am grateful to the Members for responding to the debate. I am also grateful to the Committee for its consideration. I recognise that it is not the ideal situation, but I think that the Committee understood that there was a very narrow window in which to renew these regulations and put them on a more permanent…

    Not flagged

  20. Debate contribution: Parental Bereavement Leave (No. 2) Regulations (Northern Ireland) 2023

    Key to the success of the Assembly and Executive is proving to workers and their families that we are on their side, so I commend Minister Murphy for bringing forward these important paid parental bereavement regulations. Doing so in his first few weeks in office is a demonstration of his priorities. It underlines his…

    Not flagged

  21. Debate contribution: Parental Bereavement Leave (No. 2) Regulations (Northern Ireland) 2023

    • Mr Conor Murphy SF
    • Executive Committee Business
    • As a minister

    I beg to move I seek the Assembly's approval for the Statutory Parental Bereavement Pay (General) (No. 2) Regulations 2023; the Parental Bereavement Leave (No. 2) Regulations 2023; and the Parental Bereavement Leave and Pay (Consequential Amendments to Subordinate Legislation) (No. 2) Regulations 2023. The regulations…

    Not flagged

Download all records matching these filters (up to 100,000 rows): CSV · JSON