Debate contribution: First Minister and deputy First Minister Titles

Debate contribution by Mr Daniel McCrossan on .

MLA
Mr Daniel McCrossan
Party at the time
Social Democratic and Labour Party
Date
9 March 2026
Type
Debate contribution
Business
Opposition Business
Heading
First Minister and deputy First Minister Titles
Assembly identifier
Official Report component 5452897

Read the official Assembly record

Text

I thank the Member for kindly giving way. Will he cast his memory back to the last Assembly election when his party was beating the drum of symbolism by saying, "Make history. Make Michelle First Minister" and did not mention any other issues? Surely that contradicts what he is saying now.

51 words. Text as published by the Northern Ireland Assembly.

Assessment

Not flagged

Jev’s structured answers met the documented threshold for “not flagged”.

  • Overall probability that the activity is being used to promote, exploit or escalate an identity-based controversy: 0.31 (flagging needs at least 0.70; at or below 0.30 is not flagged).
  • Criteria met: Controversy escalation (0.74).
  • No identity-based framing was identified (0.93).
  • Subject area: Sexism, misogyny, ageism and other equality groups.
  • The overall probability was low and the text did not adopt any identity-based framing.

This is an AI-generated assessment of the text, made against published criteria. It is not a finding of fact about the MLA or their intentions. The Assembly record itself is the fact.

Jev’s structured answers

Probability that each statement is true of this text (0 = no, 1 = yes). A criterion counts as met at 0.60 or above.
QuestionProbabilityMet?
Identity framing0.24No
Sectarian or communal antagonism0.03No
Cultural grievance politics0.09No
Dog-whistle messaging0.10No
Controversy escalation0.74Yes
Legitimate policy scrutiny0.07No
Overall judgement0.31Between thresholds
Context and attribution (stance)
OptionProbability
No identity-based framing (chosen)0.93
Reports or questions it0.04
Criticises or condemns it0.00
Adopts it0.03
Subject area (top five)
SubjectProbability
Sexism, misogyny, ageism and other equality groups0.49
No identity-related subject0.31
Gender, sexuality, abortion and related social issues0.11
Flags, emblems, symbols, names and memorials0.06
Constitutional question, Brexit, the Windsor Framework and sovereignty0.02

Assessed 21 October 2026 at 15:03 UTC by jev-1.13.0 (requested as typesafe/jev) under rubric 2026.10-r9, methodology 1.9.

Disagree with this assessment?

Classifications can be challenged. A person reads every challenge, and any change is recorded publicly above with its reason.

Challenge this classification