Debate contribution: Mental Health Data

Debate contribution by Mr Alan Robinson on .

MLA
Mr Alan Robinson
Party at the time
Democratic Unionist Party
Date
16 February 2026
Type
Debate contribution
Business
Private Members' Business
Heading
Mental Health Data
Assembly identifier
Official Report component 5391995

Read the official Assembly record

Text

I am content to support the motion today. The Northern Ireland Audit Office report on mental health services in Northern Ireland published in May 2023 highlighted how good data underpins effective services. The report identified weaknesses in the data landscape across healthcare. As far back as 2018, the Commissioner for Children and Young People's 'Still Waiting' report identified gaps in operational data, particularly in relation to young people and children. In 2021, the Office for Statistics Regulation reviewed mental health statistics in Northern Ireland and reached a similar conclusion: that there is limited data, leading to information gaps, that does not provide a complete picture of mental healthcare. In particular, there is an incomplete picture of data relating to outcomes and the effectiveness of treatments. It is difficult to fully assess whether our services are improving people's mental health, and, without outcome measures, you cannot properly evaluate what works. Without that evaluation, it is difficult to be assured that services represent value for money. Trying to manage reform without being able to see clearly is incredibly difficult and provides only a partial understanding of important aspects of mental health. Nor can it offer the opportunity to determine value for money for services. The Office for Statistics Regulation said that Northern Ireland needs a standardised dataset across all mental health settings, supported by clear regional guidance. It also suggested that the Department should consider developing a dedicated mental health data strategy. Across Northern Ireland, we have the highest rates of mental health problems and demand for mental health services. Staff are under serious and unrelenting pressure. Health surveys indicate that around one fifth of adults show probable mental health problems, with one in eight children and young people meeting the criteria for depression and anxiety. It is, therefore, vital that the health service here has the best tools to plan for the future and the very best data-driven evidence to support public services and understand how effective they are.

328 words. Text as published by the Northern Ireland Assembly.

Assessment

Not flagged

Jev’s structured answers met the documented threshold for “not flagged”.

  • Overall probability that the activity is being used to promote, exploit or escalate an identity-based controversy: 0.02 (flagging needs at least 0.70; at or below 0.30 is not flagged).
  • None of the five culture-war criteria was met (each was below 0.60).
  • Assessed as legitimate policy scrutiny (0.93).
  • No identity-based framing was identified (1.00).
  • Subject area: Disability (including neurodivergence and mental health), disabled people and disability or sickness benefits.
  • The overall probability was at or below the not-flagging threshold.

This is an AI-generated assessment of the text, made against published criteria. It is not a finding of fact about the MLA or their intentions. The Assembly record itself is the fact.

Jev’s structured answers

Probability that each statement is true of this text (0 = no, 1 = yes). A criterion counts as met at 0.60 or above.
QuestionProbabilityMet?
Identity framing0.02No
Sectarian or communal antagonism0.02No
Cultural grievance politics0.01No
Dog-whistle messaging0.01No
Controversy escalation0.02No
Legitimate policy scrutiny0.93Yes
Overall judgement0.02At or below not-flagging threshold
Context and attribution (stance)
OptionProbability
No identity-based framing (chosen)1.00
Reports or questions it0.00
Criticises or condemns it0.00
Adopts it0.00
Subject area (top five)
SubjectProbability
Disability (including neurodivergence and mental health), disabled people and disability or sickness benefits0.90
No identity-related subject0.09
Sexism, misogyny, ageism and other equality groups0.01
Flags, emblems, symbols, names and memorials0.00
Parades, bonfires and commemorations0.00

Assessed 21 October 2026 at 14:56 UTC by jev-1.13.0 (requested as typesafe/jev) under rubric 2026.10-r9, methodology 1.9.

Disagree with this assessment?

Classifications can be challenged. A person reads every challenge, and any change is recorded publicly above with its reason.

Challenge this classification