Debate contribution: Ministerial Code of Conduct

Debate contribution by Mrs Sinéad Ennis on .

MLA
Mrs Sinéad Ennis
Party at the time
Sinn Féin
Date
10 February 2026
Type
Debate contribution
Business
Opposition Business
Heading
Ministerial Code of Conduct
Assembly identifier
Official Report component 5435539

Read the official Assembly record

Text

I thank the Member for giving way. Does the Member agree that Mr Burrows, the now leader of the Ulster Unionist Party, who spent the first weeks of his time in the Chamber talking about koi carp and pandas falling out of trees, has no credibility when he lectures others on wasting time in the Chamber?

56 words. Text as published by the Northern Ireland Assembly.

Assessment

Not flagged

Jev’s structured answers met the documented threshold for “not flagged”.

  • Overall probability that the activity is being used to promote, exploit or escalate an identity-based controversy: 0.12 (flagging needs at least 0.70; at or below 0.30 is not flagged).
  • Criteria met: Controversy escalation (0.62).
  • No identity-based framing was identified (1.00).
  • The overall probability was at or below the not-flagging threshold.

This is an AI-generated assessment of the text, made against published criteria. It is not a finding of fact about the MLA or their intentions. The Assembly record itself is the fact.

Jev’s structured answers

Probability that each statement is true of this text (0 = no, 1 = yes). A criterion counts as met at 0.60 or above.
QuestionProbabilityMet?
Identity framing0.07No
Sectarian or communal antagonism0.04No
Cultural grievance politics0.02No
Dog-whistle messaging0.20No
Controversy escalation0.62Yes
Legitimate policy scrutiny0.03No
Overall judgement0.12At or below not-flagging threshold
Context and attribution (stance)
OptionProbability
No identity-based framing (chosen)1.00
Reports or questions it0.00
Criticises or condemns it0.00
Adopts it0.00
Subject area (top five)
SubjectProbability
No identity-related subject0.96
Sectarianism, hate crime and community relations0.02
Constitutional question, Brexit, the Windsor Framework and sovereignty0.01
Another identity-related subject0.01
Flags, emblems, symbols, names and memorials0.00

Assessed 21 October 2026 at 14:51 UTC by jev-1.13.0 (requested as typesafe/jev) under rubric 2026.10-r9, methodology 1.9.

Disagree with this assessment?

Classifications can be challenged. A person reads every challenge, and any change is recorded publicly above with its reason.

Challenge this classification