Topical question AQT 1967/22-27

Topical question by Mrs Sinéad Ennis on .

MLA
Mrs Sinéad Ennis
Party at the time
Sinn Féin
Date
26 January 2026
Type
Topical question
Assembly reference
AQT 1967/22-27
Business
Oral Answers to Questions
Assembly identifier
Official Report component 5340847

Read the official Assembly record

Text

Ms Ennis asked the Minister for Communities, given that demonstrating empathy is not a courtesy but a fundamental part of responsible leadership, whether he accepts that he showed no empathy to the people who were driven out of their homes by violent, racist mobs in Ballymena.

46 words. Text as published by the Northern Ireland Assembly.

Follow-ups by the same MLA in the Chamber

These were assessed together with this record:

Assessment

Not flagged

Jev’s structured answers met the documented threshold for “not flagged”.

  • Overall probability that the activity is being used to promote, exploit or escalate an identity-based controversy: 0.41 (flagging needs at least 0.70; at or below 0.30 is not flagged).
  • None of the five culture-war criteria was met (each was below 0.60).
  • The text criticises or condemns the framing or division (0.85).
  • Subject area: Immigration, asylum, race, ethnicity and Travellers.
  • The overall probability was low and the text did not adopt any identity-based framing.

This is an AI-generated assessment of the text, made against published criteria. It is not a finding of fact about the MLA or their intentions. The Assembly record itself is the fact.

Jev’s structured answers

Probability that each statement is true of this text (0 = no, 1 = yes). A criterion counts as met at 0.60 or above.
QuestionProbabilityMet?
Identity framing0.28No
Sectarian or communal antagonism0.05No
Cultural grievance politics0.08No
Dog-whistle messaging0.13No
Controversy escalation0.28No
Legitimate policy scrutiny0.20No
Overall judgement0.41Between thresholds
Context and attribution (stance)
OptionProbability
No identity-based framing0.08
Reports or questions it0.00
Criticises or condemns it (chosen)0.85
Adopts it0.07
Subject area (top five)
SubjectProbability
Immigration, asylum, race, ethnicity and Travellers0.51
Sectarianism, hate crime and community relations0.49
No identity-related subject0.00
Flags, emblems, symbols, names and memorials0.00
Parades, bonfires and commemorations0.00

Assessed 21 October 2026 at 14:23 UTC by jev-1.13.0 (requested as typesafe/jev) under rubric 2026.10-r9, methodology 1.9.

Disagree with this assessment?

Classifications can be challenged. A person reads every challenge, and any change is recorded publicly above with its reason.

Challenge this classification