Member's statement: Newry, Mourne and Down District Council: Threats

Member's statement by Mrs Sinéad Ennis on .

MLA
Mrs Sinéad Ennis
Party at the time
Sinn Féin
Date
2 December 2025
Type
Member's statement
Business
Members' Statements
Heading
Newry, Mourne and Down District Council: Threats
Assembly identifier
Official Report component 5271699

Read the official Assembly record

Text

I, too, will speak about the disgraceful escalation in threats against elected representatives in Newry, Mourne and Down over recent weeks. The sinister threats issued online against elected members of Newry Mourne and Down District Council are an attack on democracy and the mandate that each of us has received from the public, and they deserve unequivocal condemnation from political leaders. I express my solidarity with my colleagues on Newry, Mourne and Down District Council and colleagues from other parties with whom we work collegiately and have done since being elected. I also express my solidarity with their families. These individuals represent no one, and they will not deter Sinn Féin elected representatives, or any democratically elected representatives, from carrying out our work of representing constituents daily. Those pushing fear and scapegoating minorities promote a failed, backward agenda that has no place here. The overwhelming majority of people across this island reject that toxic narrative. Ireland, today, is diverse, inclusive and compassionate. Sinn Féin elected representatives will continue building an Ireland that rejects racism, hatred and division and promotes equality, compassion, socio-economic justice and unity. As others have said, we have seen a dangerous escalation in these incidents. It started with online abuse, threats against people, graffiti at people's homes, people being harassed when they are out shopping and socialising, bombs left at their offices and, now, this latest threat last night. Someone is going to get hurt as a result of this, and it will not be enough to offer condemnation after that. All elected representatives have a responsibility to promote human rights and equality. The language and tone of elected representatives in the Chamber and in the media should be accurate, respectful and promote unity rather than division. There is no place in our society for paramilitaries, thugs and gangsters. The gangsters behind the threats represent no one. They speak for no one, unlike those of us who have been democratically elected. We are from and of our communities, and we will continue to speak for them. All of us here must work together to face down these chilling threats against people who are democratically elected to represent their constituents.

362 words. Text as published by the Northern Ireland Assembly.

Assessment

Not flagged

Jev’s structured answers met the documented threshold for “not flagged”.

  • Overall probability that the activity is being used to promote, exploit or escalate an identity-based controversy: 0.14 (flagging needs at least 0.70; at or below 0.30 is not flagged).
  • None of the five culture-war criteria was met (each was below 0.60).
  • The text criticises or condemns the framing or division (0.96).
  • Subject area: Sectarianism, hate crime and community relations.
  • The overall probability was at or below the not-flagging threshold.

This is an AI-generated assessment of the text, made against published criteria. It is not a finding of fact about the MLA or their intentions. The Assembly record itself is the fact.

Jev’s structured answers

Probability that each statement is true of this text (0 = no, 1 = yes). A criterion counts as met at 0.60 or above.
QuestionProbabilityMet?
Identity framing0.32No
Sectarian or communal antagonism0.05No
Cultural grievance politics0.04No
Dog-whistle messaging0.14No
Controversy escalation0.08No
Legitimate policy scrutiny0.16No
Overall judgement0.14At or below not-flagging threshold
Context and attribution (stance)
OptionProbability
No identity-based framing0.03
Reports or questions it0.00
Criticises or condemns it (chosen)0.96
Adopts it0.01
Subject area (top five)
SubjectProbability
Sectarianism, hate crime and community relations0.76
Immigration, asylum, race, ethnicity and Travellers0.13
Legacy of the Troubles, victims and paramilitarism0.11
No identity-related subject0.00
Flags, emblems, symbols, names and memorials0.00

Assessed 21 October 2026 at 14:06 UTC by jev-1.13.0 (requested as typesafe/jev) under rubric 2026.10-r9, methodology 1.9.

Disagree with this assessment?

Classifications can be challenged. A person reads every challenge, and any change is recorded publicly above with its reason.

Challenge this classification