Member's statement: Executive: Record of Delivery
Member's statement by Mr Daniel McCrossan on .
- MLA
- Mr Daniel McCrossan
- Party at the time
- Social Democratic and Labour Party
- Date
- 16 September 2025
- Type
- Member's statement
- Business
- Members' Statements
- Heading
- Executive: Record of Delivery
- Assembly identifier
- Official Report component 5110876
Read the official Assembly record
Text
Over the past week, we have seen the First Minister and deputy First Minister run to the cameras to pontificate about their great record of delivery. That has actually shown, instead, that they are, jointly, completely out of touch with the needs and challenges of our people. They really need to wake up. On their watch, health waiting lists are still among the worst in Europe, and there is no credible plan to fix them: fail. When it comes to GP access, patients cannot get appointments, and services are collapsing in rural areas: fail. On hospital reform, there is endless talk but no delivery, and decisions are constantly delayed for political convenience: fail. Social care is underfunded, overstretched and dependent on families to pick up the slack: fail. On mental health services, there is strategy after strategy, yet services remain underfunded and in crisis, and addiction services are non-existent: fail. On childcare, families still pay the highest costs in the UK and Ireland, with no comprehensive scheme in place: fail. On special educational needs, which we will talk about later, thousands of children are left waiting for assessments and support years into the crisis: fail. On school budgets, schools are cutting staff and services while the Minister fights political battles instead of fixing the basics: fail. There is no sustainable university funding model, and students face higher fees and fewer opportunities than previously: fail. Teachers' pay and morale are at an all-time low, there have been years of disputes, and unresolved staffing shortages continue to worsen: fail. Affordable housing targets in their own Programme for Government are missed, and waiting lists are getting longer, while all we hear is excuses: fail. When it comes to homelessness, emergency accommodation is stretched to breaking point: fail. Planning delays, developers facing years of backlog, choking investment in our communities: fail. The waste water infrastructure system is broken, blocking new housing and development across our towns: fail. In the rates system, small businesses are being crippled while multinationals get off lightly: fail. Police officer numbers are at crisis point, and communities are being left vulnerable and exposed to serious challenges: fail. In the justice system, court backlogs stretch into years, and victims wait too long for cases to be heard: fail. Public transport services are cut, buses and trains are cancelled, and rural areas are abandoned: fail. Roads are in a terrible state, the A5 project is stalled, and Casement Park is not built: fail. The anti-poverty strategy exists on paper only, with no funding, no targets and no impact: fail. On climate action, there are big promises and plenty of ambition, but projects are blocked by political infighting and there is weak enforcement: fail. Lough Neagh pollution is an absolute disaster with no credible rescue plan: fail. Northern Ireland is stuck at the bottom of the UK league tables: fail. On economic growth, there is no long-term strategy or joined-up thinking, and SMEs are ignored. It is a disastrous Executive. It is an Executive not of delivery but of catastrophic failure.
508 words. Text as published by the Northern Ireland Assembly.
Assessment
Jev’s structured answers met the documented threshold for “not flagged”.
- Overall probability that the activity is being used to promote, exploit or escalate an identity-based controversy: 0.06 (flagging needs at least 0.70; at or below 0.30 is not flagged).
- None of the five culture-war criteria was met (each was below 0.60).
- Assessed as legitimate policy scrutiny (0.68).
- No identity-based framing was identified (1.00).
- The overall probability was at or below the not-flagging threshold.
This is an AI-generated assessment of the text, made against published criteria. It is not a finding of fact about the MLA or their intentions. The Assembly record itself is the fact.
Jev’s structured answers
| Question | Probability | Met? |
|---|---|---|
| Identity framing | 0.03 | No |
| Sectarian or communal antagonism | 0.03 | No |
| Cultural grievance politics | 0.02 | No |
| Dog-whistle messaging | 0.05 | No |
| Controversy escalation | 0.03 | No |
| Legitimate policy scrutiny | 0.68 | Yes |
| Overall judgement | 0.06 | At or below not-flagging threshold |
| Option | Probability |
|---|---|
| No identity-based framing (chosen) | 1.00 |
| Reports or questions it | 0.00 |
| Criticises or condemns it | 0.00 |
| Adopts it | 0.00 |
| Subject | Probability |
|---|---|
| No identity-related subject | 0.54 |
| Disability (including neurodivergence and mental health), disabled people and disability or sickness benefits | 0.46 |
| Flags, emblems, symbols, names and memorials | 0.00 |
| Parades, bonfires and commemorations | 0.00 |
| Irish language, Ulster-Scots and language policy | 0.00 |
Assessed 21 October 2026 at 13:12 UTC by jev-1.13.0 (requested as typesafe/jev) under rubric 2026.10-r9, methodology 1.9.
Disagree with this assessment?
Classifications can be challenged. A person reads every challenge, and any change is recorded publicly above with its reason.