Debate contribution: North/South Bodies: Funding
Debate contribution by Mr David Honeyford on .
- MLA
- Mr David Honeyford
- Party at the time
- Alliance Party
- Date
- 27 May 2025
- Type
- Debate contribution
- Business
- Private Members' Business
- Heading
- North/South Bodies: Funding
- Assembly identifier
- Official Report component 4972244
Read the official Assembly record
Text
It has been depressing to listen to what has been said. We have come to a point at which our public services are under severe strain. We have had 14 years of Tory Government austerity cuts to our finances, and now we have a Labour Government who seem to be continuing that austerity agenda. We have a health service that is at breaking point and a housing crisis that is growing, mainly because people cannot connect to waste water infrastructure, which stops the building of houses. Our inadequate waste water infrastructure and lack of planning reform are major barriers to economic growth. We are at a critical point: we need to act decisively and secure funding to help protect and grow key services. Alliance welcomes the Irish Government's commitment to increase funding for the six North/South bodies. We are being presented with an opportunity to fund key services like InterTradeIreland to help grow our economy, create jobs and grow exports without the burden being placed on local budgets. Yet we have just heard that a party in the Chamber — the DUP — wants to reject that. I have listened to what has been said, and it simply sounds like a trap of fear, where we are living in the territorial battle of a bygone day in which everything is about land. For anyone watching, I stress that failing to support the Irish Government's commitment is indefensible. The excuse for not supporting it has no basis in any reality. The benefits of additional funding to North/South bodies — we are talking about supporting Waterways Ireland and the Loughs Agency — would be the protection of our natural resources and the promotion of sustainable tourism. We are talking about language and culture and strengthening programmes for Foras na Gaeilge and the Ulster-Scots Agency to preserve and promote diverse cultural heritage. We are talking about economic growth and creating investment through InterTradeIreland and the Special EU Programmes Body to drive job creation, innovate and grow further our cross-border trade. Everybody and every expert will tell you that cross-border trade is vital to taking our companies into Europe and increasing our export rates. The argument to reject the funding is just indefensible, especially at a time when we have strained public finances. All the outcomes that I have just mentioned are priorities of the Assembly, yet we have a mindset of fear that I just do not get. It is as though we would rather have nothing than accept a closer relationship with or investment from the South and would rather further prevent sharing this place and creating growth, which just keeps our people down. As I said at the start, it is beyond depressing. It is a frightening mindset to reject support that would not only help to alleviate the pressures on budgets but help to deliver measurable benefits for our constituents. In doing so, the DUP is undermining the Assembly's credibility and its commitment to pragmatic and practical solutions that will deliver better things for ordinary people. That is further proof that the party's cry at election time to "Make Northern Ireland work" is nothing more than an ironic slogan. It is false advertising. It bears no truth in reality. The Assembly should act now to secure the funding and translate it into real-world improvements for our environment, our economy and our cultural heritage. Alliance will always champion pragmatic, inclusive solutions that prioritise the needs of everybody here. By embracing that, the Assembly can demonstrate leadership and deliver meaningful change for people here. We are committed to building a shared and prosperous society that is sustainable. A fundamental value is working to share the island and working together to deliver better for people. We are not interested in territorial battles. It is depressing to hear the debate being reduced to arguing over land. Alliance is focused on people and on uniting people, working to bring better things for everybody here and for a shared future where we see true reconciliation between all the people who live in this place. That is laid out before us in the motion. We are happy to support it and the amendment.
696 words. Text as published by the Northern Ireland Assembly.
Assessment
Jev’s structured answers met the documented threshold for “not flagged”.
- Overall probability that the activity is being used to promote, exploit or escalate an identity-based controversy: 0.24 (flagging needs at least 0.70; at or below 0.30 is not flagged).
- None of the five culture-war criteria was met (each was below 0.60).
- Assessed as legitimate policy scrutiny (0.76).
- The text criticises or condemns the framing or division (0.81).
- Subject area: Irish language, Ulster-Scots and language policy.
- The overall probability was at or below the not-flagging threshold.
This is an AI-generated assessment of the text, made against published criteria. It is not a finding of fact about the MLA or their intentions. The Assembly record itself is the fact.
Jev’s structured answers
| Question | Probability | Met? |
|---|---|---|
| Identity framing | 0.16 | No |
| Sectarian or communal antagonism | 0.15 | No |
| Cultural grievance politics | 0.06 | No |
| Dog-whistle messaging | 0.38 | No |
| Controversy escalation | 0.16 | No |
| Legitimate policy scrutiny | 0.76 | Yes |
| Overall judgement | 0.24 | At or below not-flagging threshold |
| Option | Probability |
|---|---|
| No identity-based framing | 0.16 |
| Reports or questions it | 0.00 |
| Criticises or condemns it (chosen) | 0.81 |
| Adopts it | 0.02 |
| Subject | Probability |
|---|---|
| Irish language, Ulster-Scots and language policy | 0.90 |
| Sectarianism, hate crime and community relations | 0.06 |
| Constitutional question, Brexit, the Windsor Framework and sovereignty | 0.04 |
| No identity-related subject | 0.00 |
| Flags, emblems, symbols, names and memorials | 0.00 |
Assessed 21 October 2026 at 12:35 UTC by jev-1.13.0 (requested as typesafe/jev) under rubric 2026.10-r9, methodology 1.9.
Disagree with this assessment?
Classifications can be challenged. A person reads every challenge, and any change is recorded publicly above with its reason.