Debate contribution: Assembly Members (Remuneration Board) Bill: Consideration Stage

Debate contribution by Mr Daniel McCrossan on .

MLA
Mr Daniel McCrossan
Party at the time
Social Democratic and Labour Party
Date
13 May 2025
Type
Debate contribution
Business
Committee Business
Heading
Assembly Members (Remuneration Board) Bill: Consideration Stage
Assembly identifier
Official Report component 4947725

Read the official Assembly record

Text

I thank the Member for giving way. Does that mean that his TDs in the South, just down the road from where I live, are out of touch, given the €115,000 that they accept?

34 words. Text as published by the Northern Ireland Assembly.

Assessment

Not flagged

Jev’s structured answers met the documented threshold for “not flagged”.

  • Overall probability that the activity is being used to promote, exploit or escalate an identity-based controversy: 0.38 (flagging needs at least 0.70; at or below 0.30 is not flagged).
  • None of the five culture-war criteria was met (each was below 0.60).
  • No identity-based framing was identified (0.85).
  • The overall probability was low and the text did not adopt any identity-based framing.

This is an AI-generated assessment of the text, made against published criteria. It is not a finding of fact about the MLA or their intentions. The Assembly record itself is the fact.

Jev’s structured answers

Probability that each statement is true of this text (0 = no, 1 = yes). A criterion counts as met at 0.60 or above.
QuestionProbabilityMet?
Identity framing0.21No
Sectarian or communal antagonism0.20No
Cultural grievance politics0.03No
Dog-whistle messaging0.41No
Controversy escalation0.27No
Legitimate policy scrutiny0.22No
Overall judgement0.38Between thresholds
Context and attribution (stance)
OptionProbability
No identity-based framing (chosen)0.85
Reports or questions it0.01
Criticises or condemns it0.00
Adopts it0.14
Subject area (top five)
SubjectProbability
No identity-related subject0.84
Constitutional question, Brexit, the Windsor Framework and sovereignty0.13
Another identity-related subject0.02
Sectarianism, hate crime and community relations0.01
Flags, emblems, symbols, names and memorials0.00

Assessed 21 October 2026 at 12:33 UTC by jev-1.13.0 (requested as typesafe/jev) under rubric 2026.10-r9, methodology 1.9.

Disagree with this assessment?

Classifications can be challenged. A person reads every challenge, and any change is recorded publicly above with its reason.

Challenge this classification