Member's statement: Irish Cup Final
Member's statement by Ms Carál Ní Chuilín on .
- MLA
- Ms Carál Ní Chuilín
- Party at the time
- Sinn Féin
- Date
- 6 May 2025
- Type
- Member's statement
- Business
- Members' Statements
- Heading
- Irish Cup Final
- Assembly identifier
- Official Report component 4929216
Read the official Assembly record
Text
It might seem strange coming from me, but I congratulate Dungannon Swifts Football Club on its victory in the Irish Cup final. Well done. It was a mighty achievement for the team, the whole club, its loyal supporters who have stuck with it through thick and thin, and, indeed, the whole community, so well done. Bad luck to Cliftonville Football Club. Like many people, I had hoped that we would bring the cup back to North Belfast. Regrettably, it was not our day. I want to address the post-match incidents. I reiterate what Cliftonville FC said in its statement; it will engage fully with all relevant statutory bodies. It had those engagements prior to the match and it will certainly have them post-match. Like the club, I condemn, on record, the completely unacceptable behaviour of a small minority of fans. Genuine fans were caught up in those incidents. We have been contacted by many people who were at the game on Saturday afternoon, including some who were part of three generations of the same family and had brought their grandkids with them. They were caught up in the middle of it; it was really terrifying for them. They said that health and safety concerns need to be addressed at a minimum. We will discuss the policing operation on the day, both prior to and post the match. I also take the opportunity to condemn the people who were behind threats to Catholic residents in the Skegoneill area of North Belfast. There are reports that the PSNI visited several homes in the area to inform residents that they had been targeted by a criminal gang. My understanding is that at least one family has moved out and others are talking about doing the same.
Let me be clear: sectarianism, regardless of where it presents itself, has no place in our society. Anyone who intimidates or threatens people simply because of their faith or identity needs to be challenged and called out by all of us. Political leaders here need to make it clear that they reject that vile behaviour and, indeed, the thugs behind it.
354 words. Text as published by the Northern Ireland Assembly.
Assessment
Jev’s structured answers met the documented threshold for “not flagged”.
- Overall probability that the activity is being used to promote, exploit or escalate an identity-based controversy: 0.08 (flagging needs at least 0.70; at or below 0.30 is not flagged).
- None of the five culture-war criteria was met (each was below 0.60).
- The text criticises or condemns the framing or division (0.99).
- Subject area: Sectarianism, hate crime and community relations.
- The overall probability was at or below the not-flagging threshold.
This is an AI-generated assessment of the text, made against published criteria. It is not a finding of fact about the MLA or their intentions. The Assembly record itself is the fact.
Jev’s structured answers
| Question | Probability | Met? |
|---|---|---|
| Identity framing | 0.26 | No |
| Sectarian or communal antagonism | 0.03 | No |
| Cultural grievance politics | 0.09 | No |
| Dog-whistle messaging | 0.04 | No |
| Controversy escalation | 0.09 | No |
| Legitimate policy scrutiny | 0.38 | No |
| Overall judgement | 0.08 | At or below not-flagging threshold |
| Option | Probability |
|---|---|
| No identity-based framing | 0.01 |
| Reports or questions it | 0.00 |
| Criticises or condemns it (chosen) | 0.99 |
| Adopts it | 0.00 |
| Subject | Probability |
|---|---|
| Sectarianism, hate crime and community relations | 0.98 |
| Religion and belief (including people of no religion), churches, faith communities and religious prejudice (including antisemitism and anti-Muslim prejudice) | 0.02 |
| No identity-related subject | 0.00 |
| Flags, emblems, symbols, names and memorials | 0.00 |
| Parades, bonfires and commemorations | 0.00 |
Assessed 21 October 2026 at 12:23 UTC by jev-1.13.0 (requested as typesafe/jev) under rubric 2026.10-r9, methodology 1.9.
Disagree with this assessment?
Classifications can be challenged. A person reads every challenge, and any change is recorded publicly above with its reason.