Debate contribution: US Trade Tariffs: Impact on Northern Ireland
Debate contribution by Mr David Honeyford on .
- MLA
- Mr David Honeyford
- Party at the time
- Alliance Party
- Date
- 7 April 2025
- Type
- Debate contribution
- Business
- Matter of the Day
- Heading
- US Trade Tariffs: Impact on Northern Ireland
- Assembly identifier
- Official Report component 4890194
Read the official Assembly record
Text
It is DUP/TUV bingo today. We get the usual lines trumpeted out just because it is a Trump tariff. They talk about Northern Ireland first, yet all we have heard about today is the priority of American companies and the tax that they will pay coming into the EU, not realising — I am not sure what has clicked — that we do not pay tariffs into the EU. Therefore, I do not know why we have had minutes and minutes about the risks to America. We are here to speak for Northern Ireland and for our companies and businesses, but it is interesting to hear the DUP speak in support of and give the opinion of America rather than give the opinion of Northern Ireland.
If you want to continue shouting on, go ahead. Do you want me to give way?
There is no giving way, so sit down. Actions speak louder than words, which is what Jonny said a minute ago. Let us talk about red tape, which he talked about a minute ago. Let us talk to all our sporting clubs that have had levelling-up funding and let them hear about red tape. It was way easier when we were in the EU and had funding that was easy to access for all our groups. You can scaremonger and talk and you can be addicted to being on the wrong side of the argument all you like, but the tail is wagging the dog, with one Member at the back, and you are jumping to it. Let us call it for what it is: taxes are tariffs and tariffs are taxes, and these are our businesses that we are here to stand up for. They are the ones that are paying the taxes; it ain't you. We have people who are coming to pension age and whose pensions are falling through the floor, and you are in here getting social media clips to look hard and look the big man on TV. It is ridiculous that you have constantly called for borders and barriers, and Alliance will continue to speak up so that we do not have trade barriers and we do not have tariffs on our companies
This is a time when we should be working closely with our partners —.
We should be working closely with the UK Government, with the Southern Government and with the EU to make sure that Northern Ireland's voice is clearly heard. We have to maximise the voice of the Assembly to speak as one. This is a time when we should be investing in innovation and R&D. We should be increasing the number of products that we have to sell and we should be giving support to our businesses. We need a manufacturing strategy. We need stuff to come through that actually delivers for business. What we do not need are cheerleaders for a Trump Administration who are taxing the very people and causing —
Bingo! I will end with the DUP/TUV bingo. Here we go: the usual slow, thick lines that come out every single time. Let us have calm heads and not be cheerleaders for Trump.
529 words. Text as published by the Northern Ireland Assembly.
Assessment
Jev’s structured answers met the documented threshold for “not flagged”.
- Overall probability that the activity is being used to promote, exploit or escalate an identity-based controversy: 0.24 (flagging needs at least 0.70; at or below 0.30 is not flagged).
- None of the five culture-war criteria was met (each was below 0.60).
- No identity-based framing was identified (0.91).
- Subject area: Constitutional question, Brexit, the Windsor Framework and sovereignty.
- The overall probability was at or below the not-flagging threshold.
This is an AI-generated assessment of the text, made against published criteria. It is not a finding of fact about the MLA or their intentions. The Assembly record itself is the fact.
Jev’s structured answers
| Question | Probability | Met? |
|---|---|---|
| Identity framing | 0.18 | No |
| Sectarian or communal antagonism | 0.12 | No |
| Cultural grievance politics | 0.02 | No |
| Dog-whistle messaging | 0.39 | No |
| Controversy escalation | 0.22 | No |
| Legitimate policy scrutiny | 0.47 | No |
| Overall judgement | 0.24 | At or below not-flagging threshold |
| Option | Probability |
|---|---|
| No identity-based framing (chosen) | 0.91 |
| Reports or questions it | 0.00 |
| Criticises or condemns it | 0.05 |
| Adopts it | 0.04 |
| Subject | Probability |
|---|---|
| Constitutional question, Brexit, the Windsor Framework and sovereignty | 0.65 |
| No identity-related subject | 0.31 |
| Sectarianism, hate crime and community relations | 0.02 |
| Sport (including the GAA), the arts and cultural bodies | 0.01 |
| Another identity-related subject | 0.01 |
Assessed 21 October 2026 at 12:17 UTC by jev-1.13.0 (requested as typesafe/jev) under rubric 2026.10-r9, methodology 1.9.
Disagree with this assessment?
Classifications can be challenged. A person reads every challenge, and any change is recorded publicly above with its reason.