Member's statement: Limavady Grammar School: Ulster Schools' Bowl Final
Member's statement by Mr Alan Robinson on .
- MLA
- Mr Alan Robinson
- Party at the time
- Democratic Unionist Party
- Date
- 3 March 2025
- Type
- Member's statement
- Business
- Members' Statements
- Heading
- Limavady Grammar School: Ulster Schools' Bowl Final
- Assembly identifier
- Official Report component 4825682
Read the official Assembly record
Text
I want to wish good luck to Limavady Grammar School's 1st XV rugby team, which will pitch itself in battle against Ballyclare High School at the Kingspan Stadium this Wednesday in the Danske Bank Ulster Schools' Bowl final.
The road to the final was not easy, with the team having battled with Friends' School in the semi-final, eventually winning the contest 12-10, and, at 27-21, the team won against Portadown College in the quarter-final. My understanding is that few, if any, tickets for the game remain such has been the response from the school's pupils, with supporters' buses set to be packed. I congratulate the team and its coaches for getting this far. I say, "Well done" to all the boys. Enjoy this very special moment in your lives. They should all be very proud of themselves, and, from the Northern Ireland Assembly, Parliament Buildings, I wish you all the very best for your big day on Wednesday, and I hope that you bring the trophy home.
167 words. Text as published by the Northern Ireland Assembly.
Assessment
Jev’s structured answers met the documented threshold for “not flagged”.
- Overall probability that the activity is being used to promote, exploit or escalate an identity-based controversy: 0.02 (flagging needs at least 0.70; at or below 0.30 is not flagged).
- None of the five culture-war criteria was met (each was below 0.60).
- No identity-based framing was identified (1.00).
- Subject area: Sport (including the GAA), the arts and cultural bodies.
- The overall probability was at or below the not-flagging threshold.
This is an AI-generated assessment of the text, made against published criteria. It is not a finding of fact about the MLA or their intentions. The Assembly record itself is the fact.
Jev’s structured answers
| Question | Probability | Met? |
|---|---|---|
| Identity framing | 0.03 | No |
| Sectarian or communal antagonism | 0.01 | No |
| Cultural grievance politics | 0.02 | No |
| Dog-whistle messaging | 0.01 | No |
| Controversy escalation | 0.02 | No |
| Legitimate policy scrutiny | 0.02 | No |
| Overall judgement | 0.02 | At or below not-flagging threshold |
| Option | Probability |
|---|---|
| No identity-based framing (chosen) | 1.00 |
| Reports or questions it | 0.00 |
| Criticises or condemns it | 0.00 |
| Adopts it | 0.00 |
| Subject | Probability |
|---|---|
| Sport (including the GAA), the arts and cultural bodies | 0.87 |
| No identity-related subject | 0.11 |
| Education structures, integration and community division | 0.01 |
| Sexism, misogyny, ageism and other equality groups | 0.01 |
| Flags, emblems, symbols, names and memorials | 0.00 |
Assessed 21 October 2026 at 12:03 UTC by jev-1.13.0 (requested as typesafe/jev) under rubric 2026.10-r9, methodology 1.9.
Disagree with this assessment?
Classifications can be challenged. A person reads every challenge, and any change is recorded publicly above with its reason.