Debate contribution: Curriculum-led Capital Investment Programme

Debate contribution by Mr Alan Robinson on .

MLA
Mr Alan Robinson
Party at the time
Democratic Unionist Party
Date
3 December 2024
Type
Debate contribution
Business
Ministerial Statement
Heading
Curriculum-led Capital Investment Programme
Assembly identifier
Official Report component 4690829

Read the official Assembly record

Text

I very much welcome the Minister's statement. Limavady High School has no dedicated sports hall. Indeed, it is the only post-primary school in that area that has no sports hall. Young people of that school have to carry out their sports activity in a park some distance away, where two people were killed and murdered. Does the Minister agree that that needs to change?

64 words. Text as published by the Northern Ireland Assembly.

Assessment

Not flagged

Jev’s structured answers met the documented threshold for “not flagged”.

  • Overall probability that the activity is being used to promote, exploit or escalate an identity-based controversy: 0.13 (flagging needs at least 0.70; at or below 0.30 is not flagged).
  • None of the five culture-war criteria was met (each was below 0.60).
  • Assessed as legitimate policy scrutiny (0.86).
  • No identity-based framing was identified (0.95).
  • Subject area: Legacy of the Troubles, victims and paramilitarism.
  • The overall probability was at or below the not-flagging threshold.

This is an AI-generated assessment of the text, made against published criteria. It is not a finding of fact about the MLA or their intentions. The Assembly record itself is the fact.

Jev’s structured answers

Probability that each statement is true of this text (0 = no, 1 = yes). A criterion counts as met at 0.60 or above.
QuestionProbabilityMet?
Identity framing0.04No
Sectarian or communal antagonism0.03No
Cultural grievance politics0.04No
Dog-whistle messaging0.08No
Controversy escalation0.07No
Legitimate policy scrutiny0.86Yes
Overall judgement0.13At or below not-flagging threshold
Context and attribution (stance)
OptionProbability
No identity-based framing (chosen)0.95
Reports or questions it0.02
Criticises or condemns it0.02
Adopts it0.01
Subject area (top five)
SubjectProbability
Legacy of the Troubles, victims and paramilitarism0.43
No identity-related subject0.29
Education structures, integration and community division0.13
Sport (including the GAA), the arts and cultural bodies0.12
Sectarianism, hate crime and community relations0.03

Assessed 21 October 2026 at 11:41 UTC by jev-1.13.0 (requested as typesafe/jev) under rubric 2026.10-r9, methodology 1.9.

Disagree with this assessment?

Classifications can be challenged. A person reads every challenge, and any change is recorded publicly above with its reason.

Challenge this classification