Debate contribution: Mental Health Provision in Northern Ireland

Debate contribution by Mr Alan Robinson on .

MLA
Mr Alan Robinson
Party at the time
Democratic Unionist Party
Date
30 September 2024
Type
Debate contribution
Business
Opposition Business
Heading
Mental Health Provision in Northern Ireland
Assembly identifier
Official Report component 4563566

Read the official Assembly record

Text

It is with profound regret that we have had to debate the state of mental health provision in the Province. Despite the progress that we have made in some areas, the state of mental healthcare remains deeply troubling. The sour truth is that the number of lives lost to suicide in Northern Ireland exceeds the number of those who lost their lives during the Troubles. Its trajectory tells us that those figures may indeed get worse. Figures from December 2023 tell us that 17,500 people are waiting for a first appointment. I have no doubt that we would be staring at even starker figures had it not been for the £10 million that was secured by my party via the confidence-and-supply agreement that allowed additional investment in mental health services over a five-year period. As has been stated on the Floor many times, without timely interventions, people's conditions will descend into further decline, and, ultimately, their conditions will become more costly to treat or they will be lost to suicide. The Department tells us that, without additional funding and the ability to invest in the workforce, it will struggle to address waiting lists. On top of that, the Secretary of State tells us that we must live within our means. For someone on that long waiting list, if we were to be honest, very sadly, as things stand, there is no extra money and little hope. Emergency departments will continue to be the fallback position for so many in desperate need, placing further strain on an already struggling health service and adding further pressure to our education and justice systems. Then, we have the situation where those on the outer fringes, such as the community and voluntary sector, which has picked up the slack in providing support for those with mental health issues, have had their funding slashed. It is like a never-ending circle of despair. I fear that we will be having these conversations in a debate on a similar motion before the end of the mandate and that those who come after us will debate these issues in a new mandate just like those before us debated them. I turn to some of the points that were made. Gary Middleton talked about using everything in our power to deal with the issue and about how 1,026 children are on mental health waiting lists. He also called for greater access to GP services. The proposer of the motion rightly paid tribute to groups that are at the coalface of the mental health crisis and said rightly that one life lost was too many. Diane Dodds spoke eloquently, as she usually does. She mentioned that only £9 million had been allocated to the mental health strategy. She also referred to the impact of the Troubles. Órlaithí Flynn highlighted how drug- and alcohol-related deaths have doubled. Danny Donnelly talked about the importance of sport in dealing with health. Robbie Butler referred to the impact of our violent past and to how men are four times more likely to die by suicide. Peter McReynolds said that the motion was one of the most important to have been tabled by the Opposition. Michelle Guy talked about a young constituent, Matthew Taylor. She also referred to the findings and recommendations of a recent PAC report. Timothy Gaston talked about how he has met people of all ages who are affected. He praised the work of Turning Point. Gerry Carroll said that, for groups, it is like pushing a boulder up a mountain. He rightly talked about the cut to the winter fuel payment, which will affect people's mental health. We know that the devastating impacts of mental health disorders, anxiety, depression and other mental illnesses affect people of all ages across Northern Ireland, and the burden of those conditions does not discriminate. It affects children, young adults, parents and grandparents. It affects us all. Every one of us in the Chamber can point to a family member who has suffered or is suffering. Despite the scale of the problem, our mental health services are simply woefully inadequate to meet the growing demands. I hope that the Assembly can support my party's amendment. It is broad in nature — we get that — but the meaning is there. I thank everyone who has contributed to the debate. It has been a worthy debate and has set the right tone.

734 words. Text as published by the Northern Ireland Assembly.

Assessment

Not flagged

Jev’s structured answers met the documented threshold for “not flagged”.

  • Overall probability that the activity is being used to promote, exploit or escalate an identity-based controversy: 0.07 (flagging needs at least 0.70; at or below 0.30 is not flagged).
  • None of the five culture-war criteria was met (each was below 0.60).
  • Assessed as legitimate policy scrutiny (0.94).
  • No identity-based framing was identified (0.98).
  • Subject area: Disability (including neurodivergence and mental health), disabled people and disability or sickness benefits.
  • The overall probability was at or below the not-flagging threshold.

This is an AI-generated assessment of the text, made against published criteria. It is not a finding of fact about the MLA or their intentions. The Assembly record itself is the fact.

Jev’s structured answers

Probability that each statement is true of this text (0 = no, 1 = yes). A criterion counts as met at 0.60 or above.
QuestionProbabilityMet?
Identity framing0.03No
Sectarian or communal antagonism0.02No
Cultural grievance politics0.01No
Dog-whistle messaging0.03No
Controversy escalation0.04No
Legitimate policy scrutiny0.94Yes
Overall judgement0.07At or below not-flagging threshold
Context and attribution (stance)
OptionProbability
No identity-based framing (chosen)0.98
Reports or questions it0.02
Criticises or condemns it0.00
Adopts it0.00
Subject area (top five)
SubjectProbability
Disability (including neurodivergence and mental health), disabled people and disability or sickness benefits0.74
Legacy of the Troubles, victims and paramilitarism0.18
Sexism, misogyny, ageism and other equality groups0.05
No identity-related subject0.03
Flags, emblems, symbols, names and memorials0.00

Assessed 21 October 2026 at 11:10 UTC by jev-1.13.0 (requested as typesafe/jev) under rubric 2026.10-r9, methodology 1.9.

Disagree with this assessment?

Classifications can be challenged. A person reads every challenge, and any change is recorded publicly above with its reason.

Challenge this classification