Member's statement: A5 Fatalities
Member's statement by Mr Daniel McCrossan on .
- MLA
- Mr Daniel McCrossan
- Party at the time
- Social Democratic and Labour Party
- Date
- 11 June 2024
- Type
- Member's statement
- Business
- Members' Statements
- Heading
- A5 Fatalities
- Assembly identifier
- Official Report component 4495461
Read the official Assembly record
Text
Next month — July — marks 17 years since the Northern Ireland Executive confirmed their acceptance of the A5 western transport corridor proposals to be taken forward: 17 years. In that time, 56 people have died on the A5 road, and thousands have been injured. This week, I have been alerted every day about serious accidents that have occurred on the A5. Luckily, this week, we have had no fatalities, but 56 people have died in that short space of time. The road is dangerous. It puts our citizen's lives at risk; it does not discriminate. It claims the lives of husbands and wives, sons and daughters, neighbours, friends and people throughout our community. Those people, for the record, were Janeen Black, Colin Thornton, Tony Thompson, John Walker, an unnamed lorry driver in 2007, Leslie Edgar, Mary Elizabeth Scott, Desmond Bingham, Pat McCourt, Shane Caldwell, Zoltan Szabo, Darren McAnenly, Mary Wasson, an unnamed female pedestrian in 2009, Zbigniew Bartnicki, Declan Harvey, Gareth Gallagher, Simon Glenn, Peter Fugill, Cathal Donaghy, Kovacs Szabolcs, Leo McKeever, Alexander McEntee, Patsy McCroary, Kieran McSorley, Michael McDonald, Aaron McDonald, Sean McElwee, Neil McAleer, Shane Rafferty, Caoimhe O'Brien, Maurice McCloughan, Killian Doherty, Margaret McLaughlin, Kathleen McGarvey, Sean Reid, an unnamed male in 2018, an unnamed female in 2018, Darren Gallagher, Aaron Harkin, Nathan Corrigan, Petey McNamee, Peter Finnegan — one of the most horrific accidents on the A5; those three young men lost their lives — Jonathan Reilly, David Gilmore, Sammy Patterson, Niall McDonald, John Rafferty, Julia McSorley, Christine McKane, Dan McKane, an unnamed passenger in 2023, and, since the House returned in February, Caolan Devlin, Oonagh Burns, Kamile Vaicikonyte and Jamie Moore. Those are the lives lost on that road. We need the A5 scheme announced and delivered before any further pain is added to the people of our communities. We think on them all and their families.
312 words. Text as published by the Northern Ireland Assembly.
Assessment
Jev’s structured answers met the documented threshold for “not flagged”.
- Overall probability that the activity is being used to promote, exploit or escalate an identity-based controversy: 0.03 (flagging needs at least 0.70; at or below 0.30 is not flagged).
- None of the five culture-war criteria was met (each was below 0.60).
- Assessed as legitimate policy scrutiny (0.92).
- No identity-based framing was identified (1.00).
- The overall probability was at or below the not-flagging threshold.
This is an AI-generated assessment of the text, made against published criteria. It is not a finding of fact about the MLA or their intentions. The Assembly record itself is the fact.
Jev’s structured answers
| Question | Probability | Met? |
|---|---|---|
| Identity framing | 0.02 | No |
| Sectarian or communal antagonism | 0.02 | No |
| Cultural grievance politics | 0.01 | No |
| Dog-whistle messaging | 0.02 | No |
| Controversy escalation | 0.02 | No |
| Legitimate policy scrutiny | 0.92 | Yes |
| Overall judgement | 0.03 | At or below not-flagging threshold |
| Option | Probability |
|---|---|
| No identity-based framing (chosen) | 1.00 |
| Reports or questions it | 0.00 |
| Criticises or condemns it | 0.00 |
| Adopts it | 0.00 |
| Subject | Probability |
|---|---|
| No identity-related subject | 0.84 |
| Legacy of the Troubles, victims and paramilitarism | 0.08 |
| Sexism, misogyny, ageism and other equality groups | 0.03 |
| Flags, emblems, symbols, names and memorials | 0.02 |
| Immigration, asylum, race, ethnicity and Travellers | 0.01 |
Assessed 21 October 2026 at 10:38 UTC by jev-1.13.0 (requested as typesafe/jev) under rubric 2026.10-r9, methodology 1.9.
Disagree with this assessment?
Classifications can be challenged. A person reads every challenge, and any change is recorded publicly above with its reason.