Member's statement: A5 Road Project
Member's statement by Mr Daniel McCrossan on .
- MLA
- Mr Daniel McCrossan
- Party at the time
- Social Democratic and Labour Party
- Date
- 13 February 2024
- Type
- Member's statement
- Business
- Members' Statements
- Heading
- A5 Road Project
- Assembly identifier
- Official Report component 4206124
Read the official Assembly record
Text
Since 1998, 70 people have lost their lives on the A5 road. The House has heard about that road on many occasions, but patience has worn thin. This week, we are optimistic that the new Minister, John O'Dowd, will soon make a positive decision on the A5 road. Hundreds of families await positive news, particularly after the very successful public inquiry that was very well attended over the course of two weeks. It was attended by the families who have lost loved ones over the past 20-odd years. It was also attended by businesses and locals in my constituency and beyond, who feel so strongly about the development of the project. We cannot take a single moment for granted, because every delay to the road project costs another human life. In recent times, there have been some horrific accidents on that road. I have personally known a number of people who have died in very tragic circumstances, most recently Dan McKane, his sister Christine McKane and their aunt Julia McSorley. They were on their way back from a funeral and sadly lost their lives on the Aughnacloy stretch of the A5 road. Peter McNamee, Nathan Corrigan and Peter Finnegan also lost their lives on the Ballygawley stretch of the road at Garvaghy. No section of the road is safe. The loss of those lives and the impact on those families is testament to just how dangerous that road is for each and every one of us on a daily occasion. I have not touched on the thousands of people who have been left with life-changing injuries, surviving the trauma of that road yet facing it every day as they live along it and have to access it. The road runs through the very heart of my constituency. There is no avoiding it. We are forced onto that deathtrap on a daily basis. That is why — I am sure that I do not have to convince the House — it is so critical that a decision is made soon, and I encourage the Minister for Infrastructure to do that. Equally, I encourage our colleagues in Dublin — the Taoiseach, Leo Varadkar, and the Tánaiste, Micheál Martin — to recommit significant funds to ensure the delivery of the road. Their intervention and support for the project is critical to its delivery. Today, we think of all those who have lost their lives and of their families. Let us hope, Mr Speaker, that a positive decision will arrive soon.
417 words. Text as published by the Northern Ireland Assembly.
Assessment
Jev’s structured answers met the documented threshold for “not flagged”.
- Overall probability that the activity is being used to promote, exploit or escalate an identity-based controversy: 0.04 (flagging needs at least 0.70; at or below 0.30 is not flagged).
- None of the five culture-war criteria was met (each was below 0.60).
- Assessed as legitimate policy scrutiny (0.93).
- No identity-based framing was identified (1.00).
- The overall probability was at or below the not-flagging threshold.
This is an AI-generated assessment of the text, made against published criteria. It is not a finding of fact about the MLA or their intentions. The Assembly record itself is the fact.
Jev’s structured answers
| Question | Probability | Met? |
|---|---|---|
| Identity framing | 0.03 | No |
| Sectarian or communal antagonism | 0.02 | No |
| Cultural grievance politics | 0.01 | No |
| Dog-whistle messaging | 0.02 | No |
| Controversy escalation | 0.02 | No |
| Legitimate policy scrutiny | 0.93 | Yes |
| Overall judgement | 0.04 | At or below not-flagging threshold |
| Option | Probability |
|---|---|
| No identity-based framing (chosen) | 1.00 |
| Reports or questions it | 0.00 |
| Criticises or condemns it | 0.00 |
| Adopts it | 0.00 |
| Subject | Probability |
|---|---|
| No identity-related subject | 0.93 |
| Legacy of the Troubles, victims and paramilitarism | 0.05 |
| Constitutional question, Brexit, the Windsor Framework and sovereignty | 0.01 |
| Flags, emblems, symbols, names and memorials | 0.00 |
| Parades, bonfires and commemorations | 0.00 |
Assessed 21 October 2026 at 09:35 UTC by jev-1.13.0 (requested as typesafe/jev) under rubric 2026.10-r9, methodology 1.9.
Disagree with this assessment?
Classifications can be challenged. A person reads every challenge, and any change is recorded publicly above with its reason.