Motion or amendment: Peace and Peacebuilding Mission in Programme for Government

Motion or amendment by Ms Paula Bradshaw on 1 October 2024.

MLA: Ms Paula Bradshaw
Party at the time: Alliance Party
Date: 1 October 2024
Type: Motion or amendment
Business: Motion · Private Members' Motion
Heading: Peace and Peacebuilding Mission in Programme for Government
Assembly identifier: Document 412355

Read the official Assembly record Open Data source

Text

Peace and Peacebuilding Mission in Programme for Government
That this Assembly welcomes the publication of the draft Programme for Government; recognises that the finalised Programme for Government should include a stand-alone Mission on Peace and Peacebuilding; further recognises that peacebuilding, reconciliation, equality and inclusion are vital to achieving the key ambitions in the Programme for Government; notes that political instability and the impact of societal division and paramilitarism are major barriers to growing our economy, improving our public services and creating shared, safe and prosperous communities; and calls on the First Minister and deputy First Minister to ensure a stand-alone Mission on Peace and Peacebuilding is included in the finalised Programme for Government.

113 words. Text as published by the Northern Ireland Assembly.

Also tabled by

Each MLA who tabled or co-signed this item has their own record:

Assessment

Not qualifying

Jev’s structured answers met the documented threshold for “not qualifying”.

Overall probability that the activity is being used to promote, exploit or escalate an identity-based controversy: 0.05 (qualifying needs at least 0.70; at or below 0.30 is not qualifying).
None of the five culture-war criteria was met (each was below 0.60).
Assessed as legitimate policy scrutiny (0.85).
No identity-based framing was identified (0.97).
Subject area: Legacy of the Troubles, victims and paramilitarism.
The overall probability was at or below the not-qualifying threshold.

This is an AI-generated assessment of the text, made against published criteria. It is not a finding of fact about the MLA or their intentions. The Assembly record itself is the fact.

Jev’s structured answers

Probability that each statement is true of this text (0 = no, 1 = yes). A criterion counts as met at 0.60 or above.
Question	Probability	Met?
Identity framing	0.05	No
Sectarian or communal antagonism	0.02	No
Cultural grievance politics	0.03	No
Dog-whistle messaging	0.02	No
Controversy escalation	0.04	No
Legitimate policy scrutiny	0.85	Yes
Overall judgement	0.05	At or below not-qualifying threshold

Context and attribution (stance)
Option	Probability
No identity-based framing (chosen)	0.97
Reports or questions it	0.00
Criticises or condemns it	0.03
Adopts it	0.00

Subject area (top five)
Subject	Probability
Legacy of the Troubles, victims and paramilitarism	0.72
Sectarianism, hate crime and community relations	0.26
No identity-related subject	0.02
Flags, emblems, symbols, names and memorials	0.00
Parades, bonfires and commemorations	0.00

Assessed 21 October 2026 at 08:57 UTC by jev-1.13.0 (requested as typesafe/jev) under rubric 2026.10-r9, methodology 1.9.

Disagree with this assessment?

Classifications can be challenged. A person reviews every challenge, and any change is recorded publicly above with its reason.

Challenge this classification