Written question AQW 28405/22-27

Written question by Ms Carál Ní Chuilín on .

MLA
Ms Carál Ní Chuilín
Party at the time
Sinn Féin
Date
9 June 2025
Type
Written question
Assembly reference
AQW 28405/22-27
Department
The Executive Office
Business
To the First Minister and deputy First Minister
Assembly identifier
Document 442540

Read the official Assembly record Open Data source

Text

To ask the First Minister and deputy First Minister to detail: (i) the amount of funding has been spent on staff from the Strategic Investment Board as part of the development of the Ending Violence Against Women and Girls Strategy; and (ii) when that funding started and ended within the Executive Office.

52 words. Text as published by the Northern Ireland Assembly.

Assessment

Not flagged

Jev’s structured answers met the documented threshold for “not flagged”.

  • Overall probability that the activity is being used to promote, exploit or escalate an identity-based controversy: 0.05 (flagging needs at least 0.70; at or below 0.30 is not flagged).
  • None of the five culture-war criteria was met (each was below 0.60).
  • Assessed as legitimate policy scrutiny (0.90).
  • No identity-based framing was identified (1.00).
  • Subject area: Gender, sexuality, abortion and related social issues.
  • The overall probability was at or below the not-flagging threshold.

This is an AI-generated assessment of the text, made against published criteria. It is not a finding of fact about the MLA or their intentions. The Assembly record itself is the fact.

Jev’s structured answers

Probability that each statement is true of this text (0 = no, 1 = yes). A criterion counts as met at 0.60 or above.
QuestionProbabilityMet?
Identity framing0.03No
Sectarian or communal antagonism0.02No
Cultural grievance politics0.02No
Dog-whistle messaging0.02No
Controversy escalation0.03No
Legitimate policy scrutiny0.90Yes
Overall judgement0.05At or below not-flagging threshold
Context and attribution (stance)
OptionProbability
No identity-based framing (chosen)1.00
Reports or questions it0.00
Criticises or condemns it0.00
Adopts it0.00
Subject area (top five)
SubjectProbability
Gender, sexuality, abortion and related social issues0.53
Sexism, misogyny, ageism and other equality groups0.43
No identity-related subject0.02
Legacy of the Troubles, victims and paramilitarism0.02
Flags, emblems, symbols, names and memorials0.00

Assessed 21 October 2026 at 04:00 UTC by jev-1.13.0 (requested as typesafe/jev) under rubric 2026.10-r9, methodology 1.9.

Disagree with this assessment?

Classifications can be challenged. A person reads every challenge, and any change is recorded publicly above with its reason.

Challenge this classification