Ms Sinéad McLaughlin: Assembly records

All of Ms Sinéad McLaughlin’s imported questions, contributions and motions in this mandate, newest first, including those assessed as not flagged, uncertain or not yet analysed.

2,016 records match, page 25 of 81.

  1. Motion or amendment: Bonfire Regulation - Amendment 2

    • Motion Amendment · Private Members' Motion · to “Bonfire Regulation”

    Bonfire Regulation - Amendment 2 Leave out all after “burnt;” and insert: ‘and calls on the First Minister and deputy First Minister to bring forward a full Flags, Identity, Culture and Tradition Implementation Plan as a matter of urgency.’

    Not flagged

  2. Written question AQW 30955/22-27

    • The Executive Office

    To ask the First Minister and deputy First Minister whether any consideration has been given to prioritising areas contained within the Inquiry (Mother and Baby Institutions, Magdalene Laundries and Workhouses) and Redress Scheme Bill to ensure a contingency plan is in place should the inquiry take longer than three…

    Not flagged

  3. Debate contribution: Gaza: Action to End Forced Starvation

    • Private Members' Business

    I thank the proposers of the motion. Words cannot capture the depth of the humanitarian disaster in Gaza, so, instead, let us use facts: food is running out; those who search for it are being shot; families are dying for lack of food; hospitals are receiving the dead daily; and medical workers hear unbearable stories…

    Not flagged

  4. Member's statement: North-west Rail

    • Members' Statements

    As the Assembly returns from the summer recess, I look ahead with a simple but urgent message: what we have here is not working. For too long, the north-west has been left behind when it comes to infrastructure and regional development. Nowhere is that clearer than with rail. Despite decades of underinvestment, the…

    Not flagged

  5. Debate contribution: Inquiry (Mother and Baby Institutions, Magdalene Laundries and Workhouses) and Redress Scheme Bill

    • Oral Answers to Questions

    I reiterate the point about the arbitrary nature of the date for posthumous claims. Victims and survivors need to be listened to with respect and dignity, and it is totally disrespectful to victims and survivors that that date still stands.

    Not flagged

Download all records matching these filters (up to 100,000 rows): CSV · JSON