Analysis in progress: 67,913 of 97,616 records assessed (69.6%). Totals and rankings will change until it finishes. Progress details

69.6%

Mr Jon Burrows: Assembly records

All of Mr Jon Burrows’s imported questions, contributions and motions in this mandate, newest first, including those assessed as not qualifying, uncertain or not yet analysed.

1,262 records match, page 9 of 51.

  1. Written question AQW 51527/22-27

    • Department of Education

    To ask the Minister of Education to detail (i) whether any assessment has been made by his Department of the educational value of school visits to (a) museums; (b) memorials; and (c) heritage sites; and (ii) how the revised curriculum under TransformED will support opportunities for primary school pupils to engage…

    Not qualifying

  2. Written question AQW 51525/22-27

    • Department of Education

    To ask the Minister of Education to detail any engagement (i) his Department; (ii) CCEA; and (iii) other bodies involved in TransformED, have undertaken with (a) museums; (b) heritage organisations; and (c) historical institutions, in developing the revised curriculum, including how their expertise and educational…

    Not qualifying

  3. Motion or amendment: No Confidence in the Minister of Agriculture, Environment and Rural Affairs

    • Motion · Private Members' Motion

    No Confidence in the Minister of Agriculture, Environment and Rural Affairs That this Assembly believes the Minister of Agriculture, Environment and Rural Affairs has lost the confidence of farmers, rural communities and the wider public; and calls on the Minister to resign.

    Not qualifying

  4. Written question AQW 51351/22-27

    • Department of Education

    To ask the Minister of Education whether (i) his Department has made any assessment of the impact the proposed changes to the Socially Disadvantaged Circumstances criterion on Protestant working-class boys; and (ii) this group has been specifically considered as part of any equality screening or Equality Impact…

    Not qualifying

  5. Written question AQW 51350/22-27

    • Department of Education

    To ask the Minister of Education to detail (i) whether his Department can, through its sponsorship and administrative functions, facilitate discussions regarding a temporary secondment or alternative placement for an employee of an arm's-length body who has raised concerns; and (ii) any policy or governance provisions…

    Not qualifying

  6. Written question AQW 51349/22-27

    • Department of Education

    To ask the Minister of Education, in relation to the raising-concerns and whistleblowing arrangements contained in the Partnership Agreement between his Department and CCEA dated 1 September 2026, to detail (i) any arrangements that were already in operation prior to the Agreement; (ii) any arrangements introduced by…

    Not qualifying

  7. Written question AQW 51348/22-27

    • Department of Education

    To ask the Minister of Education to detail (i) any procedures used by his Department to verify and assess assurances received from an arm's-length body regarding its handling of a raising-concerns matter; and (ii) any additional assurance arrangements that apply where a concern relates to the conduct of (a) the Chair;…

    Not qualifying

  8. Debate contribution: Display of Flags and Emblems Bill: Second Stage

    • Private Members' Business

    I am not trying to be antagonistic. There is complete condemnation of the Billy Wright flags. I condemn them. They should be taken down. No victim or anyone else should have to walk beneath the flag of a convicted terrorist. Does the Member agree, however, that all flags and emblems with references to IRA terrorists…

    Awaiting analysis

  9. Debate contribution: Display of Flags and Emblems Bill: Second Stage

    • Private Members' Business

    The UDA flags outside the police station are a perfect example. It was the security reviewer of police powers who spotted them and said to the PSNI, "How come they are outside your police station?". The PSNI said, "We do not have the power to deal with it", so the Government gave it the power, but it is still not…

    Awaiting analysis

  10. Debate contribution: Display of Flags and Emblems Bill: Second Stage

    • Private Members' Business

    The UDA flags are an absolute disgrace. That massacre, like every massacre in Northern Ireland, was absolutely unjustified and unjustifiable. Is there not a danger, however, if we pass the Bill, of creating unreasonable expectations among the public that the flags will come down? The PSNI, with all its might, is not…

    Awaiting analysis

  11. Debate contribution: Display of Flags and Emblems Bill: Second Stage

    • Private Members' Business

    It is an excellent point, and I was going to turn to it. The drafter chose the word "opinion", which is an expressly subjective term. It is "the opinion of the Department". It is not like other legislation that talks about whether something is reasonable or whether there are reasonable grounds to believe or suspect.…

    Awaiting analysis

  12. Debate contribution: Display of Flags and Emblems Bill: Second Stage

    • Private Members' Business

    First, I think that the police are wrong in their assessment of the Billy Wright flags. A Billy Wright flag does meet the criteria for the police to take action. My view is that it is a crime, but I say that as an aside. It is worth nothing that the language that the Member has used about the police making an…

    Awaiting analysis

  13. Debate contribution: Display of Flags and Emblems Bill: Second Stage

    • Private Members' Business

    Clause 1(2)(a) explicitly states: "the flag or emblem is intimidatory or threatening" and "the flag or emblem is likely to stir up hatred, or arouse fear". Those could apply, subjectively, to someone complaining about a Union flag. A Union flag, for example, is not clearly disaggregated from a terrorist flag, because…

    Awaiting analysis

Download all records matching these filters (up to 100,000 rows): CSV · JSON