Analysis in progress: 97,637 of 97,960 records assessed (99.7%). Totals and rankings will change until it finishes. Progress details
Ms Claire Sugden: Assembly records
All of Ms Claire Sugden’s imported questions, contributions and motions in this mandate, newest first, including those assessed as not flagged, uncertain or not yet analysed.
To ask the Minister for the Economy to detail (i) any assessment her Department has made of the opportunity cost of funding students, ordinarily resident in the Republic of Ireland, to study in Northern Ireland, including any impact on (a) teaching grant allocations; (b) student places; (c) research funding; and (d)…
To ask the Minister for the Economy to detail (i) whether her Department has reviewed the current funding arrangements for students, ordinarily resident in the Republic of Ireland, studying at Northern Ireland higher education institutions; (ii) any consideration that has been given to alternative models, including…
To ask the Minister for the Economy to detail (i) whether students, ordinarily resident in the Republic of Ireland, are counted within the maximum student number allocation for Northern Ireland universities; (ii) the number of places, within the current allocation, that are occupied by students from the Republic of…
To ask the Minister for the Economy to detail (i) any funding allocated to support students, ordinarily resident in the Republic of Ireland, studying at Northern Ireland higher education institutions, in each of the last five years; (ii) the number of such students that were supported in each year; (iii) the…
To ask the Minister for the Economy to detail (i) whether any reductions in teaching grant or research funding, allocated to Northern Ireland’s universities, are intended to contribute, directly or indirectly, to the funding of the expansion of the Ulster University Magee campus; (ii) any additional funding that has…
It is aye or no, but I do not have the context to go down the route of saying aye. I will go through the No Lobby when we vote, but, if I were to have the context that neither you nor the Executive have provided, I might go through the Aye Lobby. We can change our mind if information is available. I think that you…
Minister, you are misrepresenting me. I did not say that. I said that I am sympathetic to what you are trying to do. I am just not sympathetic with how you are trying to do it. A Back-Bench amendment is not the appropriate vehicle by which to do it. I would much rather see a collective Executive response, and I…
No, I will make progress, because I expect that the intervention will be more of the same. What I suggest to you is that, if you want to move forward on the issue, which you and your colleagues are clearly so passionate about — as I said, I am not unsympathetic to what you are trying to do — you need to convince us as…
Wow, Minister. I think that you are failing to govern, which is why this is being introduced as a Back-Bench amendment by your party. What I am suggesting to you is —.
No, Minister, I am not making excuses for taking no decision; I have said that I cannot accept the premise of the change on the basis of amendments, because I am not convinced that that is the right way to do it. I have heard others say the same. With respect, Minister, if you cannot do it as a Minister in the…
It is the silo approach to our government. It is the fact that the Departments are not working together. That is the failure. That is where progress has not happened. I appreciate what the Minister said about a trauma-informed approach. Prior to her being announced as Justice Minister, I met with her permanent…
No, I want to finish my point. I will give way in a minute. My point is that, if we cannot get that commitment around the Executive table, how can we genuinely ensure that what we are trying to do will be fully implemented? That is a risk.
I did not say that progress was not happening outside of the Building. My point was that progress has not happened inside it. Otherwise, the measure would be in a stand-alone Bill introduced by the Minister of Justice, not an amendment from one of her party colleagues on the Back Benches. The reason that it has been…
Minister, I agree with you, but what is being proposed is the end point rather than being about how we get there. I will continue, and the Minister can interject as appropriate. Had this proposal come before the Assembly as part of a fully developed Executive strategy, not a Justice proposal as such, but supported by…
I appreciate that, and I have reviewed the Ray Jones report. I can see the groundwork that has been laid, but my difficulty is that that was a health and social care report. Minister, with respect, if we were going to get the support from an Executive who have to follow through on legislation, the change would have…
I am sure that you are all delighted to see me stand to give my contribution — well, we will see. Thank you, Mr Speaker. I hope to give a different perspective from that of other Members. I am not able to support any of the amendments, and, in my contribution, I will explain why. If children as young as 10 are coming…
To ask the Minister for the Economy to detail (i) any assessment she has made on whether an inflationary adjustment to tuition fees is distinct from a real-terms increase in tuition fees; (ii) why the Review of Higher Education Funding did not recommend annual inflationary uprating of the tuition fee cap; (iii) any…
To ask the Minister for the Economy to detail (i) any assessment her Department has made of the impact that recent public disorder, together with changes to UK immigration and student visa policy, may have on the recruitment and retention of international students; (ii) whether she has received representations from…
To ask the Minister for the Economy to detail (i) any assessment that was undertaken, as part of the Review of Higher Education Funding, of the impact of the maximum student number cap on Northern Ireland’s ability to meet future workforce and skills needs; (ii) whether consideration was given to increasing or…