Search Assembly records

Every imported question, contribution and motion, with its classification. Unflagged, uncertain and not-yet-analysed records are all included so the analysis can be checked independently.

108,608 records match, page 3179 of 4345.

  1. Debate contribution: Health Budget 2024-25

    • Mr Mike Nesbitt UUP
    • Oral Answers to Questions
    • As a minister

    We received £122 million in June monitoring, which was very welcome. It has made a good contribution to the deficit. However, following an additional push for savings from our arm's-length bodies, the gap is now a reduced but still significant £130 million to £135 million. I commend the trusts, which have made…

    Not flagged

  2. Debate contribution: Multidisciplinary Teams

    • Mr Mike Nesbitt UUP
    • Oral Answers to Questions
    • As a minister

    I am not sure whether it was the practice manager or one of the doctors in the Castle Practice who felt that East Antrim had been knocked out of its place in the pecking order. The next three proposed federations for MDT are North Belfast, the South West, which is Fermanagh and Omagh, and, indeed, East Antrim. All are…

    Not flagged

  3. Debate contribution: Multidisciplinary Teams

    • Mr Mike Nesbitt UUP
    • Oral Answers to Questions
    • As a minister

    I very much enjoyed the visit with the Member to Carrickfergus and East Antrim, and I thank him for the invitation. It was useful to see at first hand the convincing case that the Castle Practice has made for an investment in its premises. The pharmacy is among the top three busiest in the whole of Northern Ireland. I…

    Not flagged

  4. Debate contribution: Children's Social Work Teams

    • Mr Mike Nesbitt UUP
    • Oral Answers to Questions
    • As a minister

    Meetings, particularly between officials and stakeholders, including the unions, happen all the time. I am more than happy to engage when appropriate. I want to see a workforce in which there are no vacancies and where people are as content as possible in their role because they feel that they are being cherished and…

    Not flagged

  5. Debate contribution: Children's Social Work Teams

    Thank you. Having previously been a social worker, I understand that. The Minister mentioned the shift left: social workers are out there every day of the week on the left and at the coalface. Will the Minister provide an update on what meetings he plans to have with trade unions and representative groups to address…

    Not analysed

  6. Debate contribution: Children's Social Work Teams

    • Mr Mike Nesbitt UUP
    • Oral Answers to Questions
    • As a minister

    Pay and workforce challenges are among our most pressing, difficult and intractable issues. I acknowledged previously, for example, that, with pay rates in Health and Social Care (HSC), it is difficult, if not impossible, to compete with Sláintecare, particularly in the border areas. The Western Trust and Southern…

    Not flagged

  7. Debate contribution: Causeway Hospital: Relocation of Emergency Department

    • Mr Mike Nesbitt UUP
    • Oral Answers to Questions
    • As a minister

    I know how they arrived at option 7, and that was by listening to the clinicians. I visited the Causeway Hospital and Antrim Area Hospital one day a few weeks ago, and I met some clinicians who were involved. I have to say to the Member that their view was that that option was not, as the trust put it, their…

    Not flagged

  8. Debate contribution: Causeway Hospital: Relocation of Emergency Department

    I thank the Minister for his detailed response. If you look at a map of Northern Ireland and take the health proposals, you will find that nearly all specialist services are centred in and around Belfast, part of which is in Antrim. That leaves those of us on the north coast, right through north Antrim and east…

    Not analysed

  9. Debate contribution: Causeway Hospital: Relocation of Emergency Department

    • Mr Mike Nesbitt UUP
    • Oral Answers to Questions
    • As a minister

    I thank the Member. I acknowledge that there are legitimate concerns when you move services from one place to another. Yes, the Northern Trust is consulting on removing emergency general surgery from the Causeway Hospital in Coleraine to Antrim Area Hospital in Antrim town. That is a live consultation, and it is only…

    Not flagged

  10. Debate contribution: Public Health Bill: Consultation Response

    • Mr Mike Nesbitt UUP
    • Oral Answers to Questions
    • As a minister

    No Bill has been written, and the Bill's composition will be dictated to an extent by the public's reaction to that consultation process. However, it will also be up to the Assembly and the Committee for Health to decide the shape of the Bill. Again, I do not feel that I am the only person making decisions here. I…

    Not flagged

  11. Debate contribution: Public Health Bill: Consultation Response

    Minister, if there are numerous objections to a specific part of the consultation, will you give an undertaking that, if that is the will of the public, you will remove those specific clauses from any future Bill ?

    Not analysed

  12. Debate contribution: Public Health Bill: Consultation Response

    • Mr Mike Nesbitt UUP
    • Oral Answers to Questions
    • As a minister

    I thank the Member for his question. This is, of course, a very important area that we are discussing. I have not yet had a briefing on the number of responses, so I am not even aware of that, never mind whether they are positive or negative. I am aware of the strong campaign against some of the proposals. I…

    Not flagged

  13. Debate contribution: Serious Adverse Incident Review Process

    • Mr Mike Nesbitt UUP
    • Oral Answers to Questions
    • As a minister

    I am sorry: I did not quite catch that. I acknowledge that the SAI procedure, as currently constituted, is not fit for purpose. I am determined that we bring one forward that is efficient, fast and patient-centred.

    Not flagged

  14. Debate contribution: Serious Adverse Incident Review Process

    I thank the Minister for his answer and for giving way. Minister, I want to understand the value of the engagement that has happened. Are you satisfied that that is doing what it should be doing?

    Not analysed

  15. Debate contribution: Serious Adverse Incident Review Process

    • Mr Mike Nesbitt UUP
    • Oral Answers to Questions
    • As a minister

    OK. The redesign of the current serious adverse incident (SAI) procedure is important and one of my Department's priorities. We are undertaking extensive engagement with a broad range of stakeholders. That includes the Patient and Client Council engagement platform, which comprises five individuals with lived…

    Not flagged

  16. Debate contribution: GP Indemnity: BMA Concerns

    • Mr Mike Nesbitt UUP
    • Oral Answers to Questions
    • As a minister

    I thank the Member for his question. Absolutely: I have talked often about a "shift left" for healthcare delivery. By that I mean getting healthcare out of hospitals and into the community and primary care practices. The primary care elective service is hugely important in providing five key pathways in dermatology,…

    Not flagged

  17. Debate contribution: GP Indemnity: BMA Concerns

    Does the Minister agree that primary care will have a very important role to play in helping to resolve our totally unacceptable waiting times? Will the Minister give an assurance that he and his Department recognise the value of the primary care elective scheme?

    Not flagged

  18. Debate contribution: GP Indemnity: BMA Concerns

    • Mr Mike Nesbitt UUP
    • Oral Answers to Questions
    • As a minister

    The Member's use of the term "sleight of hand" will be deeply resented by officials in the Department of Health. I encourage you to eyeball them and make that accusation. There was a very frank, honest and robust discussion this morning on the issue. My officials are absolutely certain in their position, and I have…

    Not flagged

  19. Debate contribution: GP Indemnity: BMA Concerns

    Minister, the medical fraternity is quite clear that it was offered money for GP indemnity. Was that not the case? We all lobbied for that, and we were told that it was being delivered. However, GPs found that, although they got the money, it had been removed from other parts of their contract. That is a sleight of…

    Not flagged

  20. Debate contribution: GP Indemnity: BMA Concerns

    • Mr Mike Nesbitt UUP
    • Oral Answers to Questions
    • As a minister

    It is my understanding that there was a negotiation, not just about the money that would go into the general medical services contract but about the work that that would cover. There was a rejigging of the services that were to be commissioned. It is not necessarily accepted by all, but my officials are very clear…

    Not flagged

Download all records matching these filters (up to 100,000 rows): CSV · JSON