Search Assembly records

Every imported question, contribution and motion, with its classification. Unflagged, uncertain and not-yet-analysed records are all included so the analysis can be checked independently.

107,471 records match, page 2083 of 4299.

  1. Debate contribution: End Israeli Impunity in Gaza

    I wrote an extensive section for my contribution that highlighted Sinn Féin's support for global terrorism, including support for Libya's Colonel Gaddafi and Yasser Arafat of the PLO, and how it is that that drives Sinn Féin's bias in the region and its ideology. I decided against including it, however. I instead…

    Flagged Sectarianism, hate crime and community relations Criteria met: Dog-whistle messaging.

  2. Debate contribution: End Israeli Impunity in Gaza

    Thank you, Mr Speaker. What is happening in the Middle East is a tragedy, as are other conflicts right across the globe, many of which receive little or no recognition. Thousands of people are being killed and injured right across the Middle East. Families are being separated and displaced. There is forced hunger and…

    Not flagged

  3. Debate contribution: End Israeli Impunity in Gaza

    On a point of order, Mr Speaker. Under Standing Order 13, I would like to make a point of order on the inclusion in the Order Paper of the private Members' motion entitled "End Israeli Impunity in Gaza". I wish you to adjudicate as to whether the motion is compatible with the International Holocaust Remembrance…

    Not flagged

  4. Debate contribution: End Israeli Impunity in Gaza

    I beg to move Since October 2023, at least 56,000 Palestinian people have been killed in Israel's genocidal war in Gaza. Almost 1,000 have been slaughtered in the West Bank. According to UNICEF, Gaza has become a graveyard for children. It is now the most dangerous place on this planet for children to live. Today in…

    Not flagged

  5. Debate contribution: The draft Legal Complaints and Regulation Act (Northern Ireland) 2016 (Appeals) Regulations 2025

    • Mr John O'Dowd SF
    • Executive Committee Business
    • As a minister

    I beg to move

    Not analysed

  6. Debate contribution: The draft Legal Complaints and Regulation (Penalty) Order (Northern Ireland) 2025

    I appreciate the Minister's giving way. Can he outline why we have not been able to calculate an exact cost at this stage, given that the legislation passed nine years ago? It is difficult for us, as Members, to go a solicitor and say that we voted through these regulations, but we cannot tell you how much it will…

    Not flagged

  7. Debate contribution: The draft Legal Complaints and Regulation (Penalty) Order (Northern Ireland) 2025

    • Mr John O'Dowd SF
    • Executive Committee Business
    • As a minister

    Go raibh maith agat, a Phríomh-Leas-Cheann Comhairle. I am grateful to Members for their contributions. As I set out, these regulations give effect to the Legal Complaints and Regulation Act 2016 by establishing the post of Legal Services Oversight Commissioner. Introducing a layperson-led complaints process against…

    Not flagged

  8. Debate contribution: The draft Legal Complaints and Regulation (Penalty) Order (Northern Ireland) 2025

    During the process of reviewing the statutory rules, which will enact the role of the Legal Services Oversight Commissioner, the Finance Committee received a briefing on 21 May 2025, at which I raised a number of questions, and another briefing on Wednesday 18 June, at which I raised more questions. I do not feel as…

    Not flagged

  9. Debate contribution: The draft Legal Complaints and Regulation (Penalty) Order (Northern Ireland) 2025

    I welcome the fact that we have reached the stage of being able to move forward with providing the Legal Services Oversight Commissioner with a full range of powers from September this year, particularly as the Act was passed in 2016. There has been considerable delay in getting to this point. As we heard at…

    Not flagged

  10. Debate contribution: The draft Legal Complaints and Regulation (Penalty) Order (Northern Ireland) 2025

    I will draw my remarks to a conclusion, Madam Principal Deputy Speaker. I hope that the Minister will consider offering clarity in his winding- up remarks about whether he offered a direction on the A5. That is of the utmost importance.

    Not flagged

  11. Debate contribution: The draft Legal Complaints and Regulation (Penalty) Order (Northern Ireland) 2025

    I will take my seat, but that is unbelievably important information.

    Not analysed

  12. Debate contribution: The draft Legal Complaints and Regulation (Penalty) Order (Northern Ireland) 2025

    My utmost important point is this: the question was not answered as to whether the Minister gave a direction to his officials in October in relation to progressing the A5. Will he clarify that point now — I will give way to him — or in his remarks later? That is critical for the people who care about the construction…

    Not flagged

  13. Debate contribution: The draft Legal Complaints and Regulation (Penalty) Order (Northern Ireland) 2025

    — about whether the Minister issued a ministerial direction. I would —.

    Not analysed

  14. Debate contribution: The draft Legal Complaints and Regulation (Penalty) Order (Northern Ireland) 2025

    Principal Deputy Speaker, there is an outstanding question —

    Not analysed

  15. Debate contribution: The draft Legal Complaints and Regulation (Penalty) Order (Northern Ireland) 2025

    • Mr John O'Dowd SF
    • Executive Committee Business
    • As a minister

    I beg to move The legal profession is crucial in upholding the rule of law, ensuring access to justice and protecting individual rights. The work of the profession ensures fairness, accountability and the proper functioning of the legal system. We must therefore ensure that there are proper mechanisms for people to…

    Not flagged

  16. Debate contribution: Inquiry (Mother and Baby Institutions, Magdalene Laundries and Workhouses) and Redress Scheme Bill: Second Stage

    I thank the Minister for taking an intervention. I really do welcome what she has said, particularly about the geophysical surveys. However, what is really important is what happens when those are carried out, who carries them out, and that institutions or churches, which are not covered by the public cemetery rules,…

    Not flagged

  17. Debate contribution: Inquiry (Mother and Baby Institutions, Magdalene Laundries and Workhouses) and Redress Scheme Bill: Second Stage

    I appreciate the junior Minister giving way and welcome her comments about not replicating the Southern scheme. I appreciate that we are in the early stages, Minister, but will you clarify whether there have been any discussions about Capita's involvement in any of the payment schemes? There have been serious human…

    Not flagged

  18. Debate contribution: Inquiry (Mother and Baby Institutions, Magdalene Laundries and Workhouses) and Redress Scheme Bill: Second Stage

    I thank the junior Minister for giving way. I may be reading too much into what you have just said, but is the posthumous date, for example, something that you will work on with departmental officials over the summer with the aim of tabling an amendment, as opposed to the Committee having to do so?

    Not flagged

Download all records matching these filters (up to 100,000 rows): CSV · JSON