Debate contribution: SelectUSA Investment Summit

Debate contribution by Mr Phillip Brett on .

MLA
Mr Phillip Brett
Party at the time
Democratic Unionist Party
Date
19 May 2026
Type
Debate contribution
Business
Oral Answers to Questions
Heading
SelectUSA Investment Summit
Assembly identifier
Official Report component 5549455

Read the official Assembly record

Text

The Minister recognises that Invest Northern Ireland remains the leader in attracting foreign direct investment to Northern Ireland. Given that, Minister, why have you not responded to my question for written answer of 15 March, in which I asked how many names came forward to you from your officials for appointment to the board of Invest Northern Ireland? Why have you not supplied that figure, when you took the decision to appoint two Sinn Féin members to the board? What have you got to hide?

85 words. Text as published by the Northern Ireland Assembly.

Assessment

Not flagged

Jev’s structured answers met the documented threshold for “not flagged”.

  • Overall probability that the activity is being used to promote, exploit or escalate an identity-based controversy: 0.44 (flagging needs at least 0.70; at or below 0.30 is not flagged).
  • None of the five culture-war criteria was met (each was below 0.60).
  • No identity-based framing was identified (0.83).
  • Subject area: Sectarianism, hate crime and community relations.
  • The overall probability was low and the text did not adopt any identity-based framing.

This is an AI-generated assessment of the text, made against published criteria. It is not a finding of fact about the MLA or their intentions. The Assembly record itself is the fact.

Jev’s structured answers

Probability that each statement is true of this text (0 = no, 1 = yes). A criterion counts as met at 0.60 or above.
QuestionProbabilityMet?
Identity framing0.21No
Sectarian or communal antagonism0.09No
Cultural grievance politics0.03No
Dog-whistle messaging0.23No
Controversy escalation0.32No
Legitimate policy scrutiny0.30No
Overall judgement0.44Between thresholds
Context and attribution (stance)
OptionProbability
No identity-based framing (chosen)0.83
Reports or questions it0.01
Criticises or condemns it0.00
Adopts it0.16
Subject area (top five)
SubjectProbability
Sectarianism, hate crime and community relations0.41
No identity-related subject0.38
Another identity-related subject0.12
Constitutional question, Brexit, the Windsor Framework and sovereignty0.06
Religion and belief (including people of no religion), churches, faith communities and religious prejudice (including antisemitism and anti-Muslim prejudice)0.02

Assessed 21 October 2026 at 15:42 UTC by jev-1.13.0 (requested as typesafe/jev) under rubric 2026.10-r9, methodology 1.9.

Disagree with this assessment?

Classifications can be challenged. A person reads every challenge, and any change is recorded publicly above with its reason.

Challenge this classification