Debate contribution: Hunting with Dogs Bill: Second Stage

Debate contribution by Mr Paul Frew on .

MLA
Mr Paul Frew
Party at the time
Democratic Unionist Party
Date
26 May 2026
Type
Debate contribution
Business
Private Members' Business
Heading
Hunting with Dogs Bill: Second Stage
Assembly identifier
Official Report component 5583229

Read the official Assembly record

Text

I thank the Member for giving way. May I say

that, if the Members opposite had wanted to end traditional hunting with red coats and horses, they could easily have formulated a Bill that stated, "This Bill is about hunting with horses". That would have captured the traditional hunt that, those Members say, they want to end. However, they want to end more than that: they want to end the gun hunter.

72 words. Text as published by the Northern Ireland Assembly.

Assessment

Not flagged

Jev’s structured answers met the documented threshold for “not flagged”.

  • Overall probability that the activity is being used to promote, exploit or escalate an identity-based controversy: 0.31 (flagging needs at least 0.70; at or below 0.30 is not flagged).
  • Criteria met: Cultural grievance politics (0.74); Controversy escalation (0.64).
  • No identity-based framing was identified (0.78).
  • Subject area: Sport (including the GAA), the arts and cultural bodies.
  • The overall probability was low and the text did not adopt any identity-based framing.

This is an AI-generated assessment of the text, made against published criteria. It is not a finding of fact about the MLA or their intentions. The Assembly record itself is the fact.

Jev’s structured answers

Probability that each statement is true of this text (0 = no, 1 = yes). A criterion counts as met at 0.60 or above.
QuestionProbabilityMet?
Identity framing0.40No
Sectarian or communal antagonism0.09No
Cultural grievance politics0.74Yes
Dog-whistle messaging0.24No
Controversy escalation0.64Yes
Legitimate policy scrutiny0.28No
Overall judgement0.31Between thresholds
Context and attribution (stance)
OptionProbability
No identity-based framing (chosen)0.78
Reports or questions it0.01
Criticises or condemns it0.00
Adopts it0.21
Subject area (top five)
SubjectProbability
Sport (including the GAA), the arts and cultural bodies0.65
No identity-related subject0.33
Flags, emblems, symbols, names and memorials0.01
Another identity-related subject0.01
Parades, bonfires and commemorations0.00

Assessed 21 October 2026 at 15:41 UTC by jev-1.13.0 (requested as typesafe/jev) under rubric 2026.10-r9, methodology 1.9.

Disagree with this assessment?

Classifications can be challenged. A person reads every challenge, and any change is recorded publicly above with its reason.

Challenge this classification