Topical question AQT 2371/22-27

Topical question by Mr Matthew O'Toole on .

MLA
Mr Matthew O'Toole
Party at the time
Social Democratic and Labour Party
Date
26 May 2026
Type
Topical question
Assembly reference
AQT 2371/22-27
Business
Oral Answers to Questions
Assembly identifier
Official Report component 5582737

Read the official Assembly record

Text

Mr O'Toole asked the First Minister and deputy First Minister, having pointed out that, after last year's riots in Ballymena and Larne, she was clear that politicians needed to stand against racism and be careful about their language and even said that the Communities Minister should consider his position, which the Member agreed with, whether the First Minister has reflected on the remarks of one Gerry Hutch, an unsuccessful candidate for Dáil Éireann in Dublin Central, who said that illegal immigrants, specifically Somalians, should be rounded up and interned in Curragh Camp, and whether she agrees that those are appalling racist remarks.

102 words. Text as published by the Northern Ireland Assembly.

Follow-ups by the same MLA in the Chamber

These were assessed together with this record:

Assessment

Not flagged

Jev’s structured answers met the documented threshold for “not flagged”.

  • Overall probability that the activity is being used to promote, exploit or escalate an identity-based controversy: 0.42 (flagging needs at least 0.70; at or below 0.30 is not flagged).
  • Criteria met: Identity framing (0.62).
  • The text criticises or condemns the framing or division (1.00).
  • Subject area: Immigration, asylum, race, ethnicity and Travellers.
  • The overall probability was low and the text did not adopt any identity-based framing.

This is an AI-generated assessment of the text, made against published criteria. It is not a finding of fact about the MLA or their intentions. The Assembly record itself is the fact.

Jev’s structured answers

Probability that each statement is true of this text (0 = no, 1 = yes). A criterion counts as met at 0.60 or above.
QuestionProbabilityMet?
Identity framing0.62Yes
Sectarian or communal antagonism0.06No
Cultural grievance politics0.10No
Dog-whistle messaging0.18No
Controversy escalation0.28No
Legitimate policy scrutiny0.35No
Overall judgement0.42Between thresholds
Context and attribution (stance)
OptionProbability
No identity-based framing0.00
Reports or questions it0.00
Criticises or condemns it (chosen)1.00
Adopts it0.00
Subject area (top five)
SubjectProbability
Immigration, asylum, race, ethnicity and Travellers1.00
No identity-related subject0.00
Flags, emblems, symbols, names and memorials0.00
Parades, bonfires and commemorations0.00
Irish language, Ulster-Scots and language policy0.00

Assessed 21 October 2026 at 15:38 UTC by jev-1.13.0 (requested as typesafe/jev) under rubric 2026.10-r9, methodology 1.9.

Disagree with this assessment?

Classifications can be challenged. A person reads every challenge, and any change is recorded publicly above with its reason.

Challenge this classification