Debate contribution: Criminal Bar Association Strike: Ian McCollum Case
Debate contribution by Mrs Naomi Long on .
- MLA
- Mrs Naomi Long
- Party at the time
- Alliance Party
- Date
- 12 May 2026
- Type
- Debate contribution (made as a minister)
- Business
- Oral Answers to Questions
- Heading
- Criminal Bar Association Strike: Ian McCollum Case
- Assembly identifier
- Official Report component 5528568
Read the official Assembly record
Text
First, I thank the Member, who, along with her constituency colleagues, brought Kathryn and Aaron McCollum to meet me and my officials last week. Ian McCollum's case was most horrific, not just because of the loss of life but because of the circumstances in which it happened. I am relieved, for their sake, that a full trial did not have to proceed and that they were not subjected to further delay. I cannot help but be disappointed that an earlier guilty plea, which could have relieved them of a wait of four and a half years, was not forthcoming, but such is the system within which we work. On the Criminal Bar Association strike, I have asked my officials to assess the recommendations and provide advice to me as a matter of urgency. I am waiting for that process to be completed, and I hope that it will ultimately result in an immediate return to service. As I said when I met the McCollum family, however, I believe that the CBA ought to return to service now. As Minister, I ought not to be in a position in which I feel as though I am negotiating with a gun to my head, but that is essentially what is happening. I am fearful of the attrition of victims and witnesses through the processes. I am concerned about the impact on their mental health, given the length of time that they are having to wait, and about the impact on our wider justice system, where backlogs build up and there are not the financial reserves to address them. That is doing damage to the justice system, and I argue that it is also doing damage to the credibility of the criminal Bar. I urge those people to go back to work. I urge them to come back around the table with me so that we can resolve the issues in a fair way, based on the evidence that the accelerated review has presented.
331 words. Text as published by the Northern Ireland Assembly.
Assessment
Jev’s structured answers met the documented threshold for “not flagged”.
- Overall probability that the activity is being used to promote, exploit or escalate an identity-based controversy: 0.04 (flagging needs at least 0.70; at or below 0.30 is not flagged).
- None of the five culture-war criteria was met (each was below 0.60).
- Assessed as legitimate policy scrutiny (0.88).
- No identity-based framing was identified (1.00).
- The overall probability was at or below the not-flagging threshold.
This is an AI-generated assessment of the text, made against published criteria. It is not a finding of fact about the MLA or their intentions. The Assembly record itself is the fact.
Jev’s structured answers
| Question | Probability | Met? |
|---|---|---|
| Identity framing | 0.03 | No |
| Sectarian or communal antagonism | 0.04 | No |
| Cultural grievance politics | 0.01 | No |
| Dog-whistle messaging | 0.04 | No |
| Controversy escalation | 0.04 | No |
| Legitimate policy scrutiny | 0.88 | Yes |
| Overall judgement | 0.04 | At or below not-flagging threshold |
| Option | Probability |
|---|---|
| No identity-based framing (chosen) | 1.00 |
| Reports or questions it | 0.00 |
| Criticises or condemns it | 0.00 |
| Adopts it | 0.00 |
| Subject | Probability |
|---|---|
| No identity-related subject | 0.88 |
| Disability (including neurodivergence and mental health), disabled people and disability or sickness benefits | 0.08 |
| Legacy of the Troubles, victims and paramilitarism | 0.03 |
| Gender, sexuality, abortion and related social issues | 0.01 |
| Flags, emblems, symbols, names and memorials | 0.00 |
Assessed 21 October 2026 at 15:36 UTC by jev-1.13.0 (requested as typesafe/jev) under rubric 2026.10-r9, methodology 1.9.
Disagree with this assessment?
Classifications can be challenged. A person reads every challenge, and any change is recorded publicly above with its reason.