Member's statement: Enniskillen Royal Grammar School

Member's statement by Ms Diana Armstrong on .

MLA
Ms Diana Armstrong
Party at the time
Ulster Unionist Party
Date
5 May 2026
Type
Member's statement
Business
Members' Statements
Heading
Enniskillen Royal Grammar School
Assembly identifier
Official Report component 5524325

Read the official Assembly record

Text

Last Wednesday was a special day for Enniskillen. On 29 April, the Minister of Education announced funding for a new build for Enniskillen Royal Grammar School. On the same day, a blue plaque was unveiled in honour of James Gamble, the man from Enniskillen who went on to co-found Procter and Gamble, one of the biggest companies in the world. That is no small thing. That is Enniskillen's story in one day, and it got me thinking about what Portora Royal School and Enniskillen Collegiate Grammar School — Enniskillen Royal Grammar School as they are today — have given to the world. Between them, they have produced truly remarkable people. Oscar Wilde walked the halls of Portora, as did Samuel Beckett, and they are two of the greatest writers that the English language has ever known. Neil Hannon, the singer and founder of the Divine Comedy, is another Portora man. Dr Denis Burkitt, who identified Burkitt's lymphoma and changed the lives of countless children across the world, was educated there too. In sport, Jimmy McCoy wore the green jersey of Ireland in rugby from1984 to 1989, winning 16 caps and playing in the Rugby World Cup. The sporting tradition runs deep. Today, the school's rowing club is one of the best in the UK and Ireland, with two Olympic coaches leading the next generation on the waters of Lough Erne. Enniskillen Collegiate Grammar, as the first girls' grammar school to be built by a public body anywhere in Northern Ireland, has its own special place in history. That alone tells us something about the ambition for and belief in young women that the town has always had. In 2016, Portora Royal School and Enniskillen Collegiate Grammar School came together to form Enniskillen Royal Grammar School. The students who walk through its doors today are the heirs to all that history.

Those are not lucky accidents: those young people were given a chance, teachers who believed in them and schools that opened doors for them. That is the point that I want to make. The funding announced last week matters not just as bricks and mortar but as a promise to the next generation. Somewhere in Enniskillen right now there is a child who could be the next great writer, the next rugby international or the next James Gamble. What we owe that child is simple: we owe them a great school, teachers and staff who are supported and a building fit for learning. Last week showed us that Enniskillen remembers where it came from. The blue plaque for James Gamble is a mark of pride in our past, and the new school funding is a mark of belief in our future. I welcome both and ask the Assembly to keep believing in what such schools can do, because history tells us that their results can be truly remarkable.

478 words. Text as published by the Northern Ireland Assembly.

Assessment

Not flagged

Jev’s structured answers met the documented threshold for “not flagged”.

  • Overall probability that the activity is being used to promote, exploit or escalate an identity-based controversy: 0.03 (flagging needs at least 0.70; at or below 0.30 is not flagged).
  • None of the five culture-war criteria was met (each was below 0.60).
  • No identity-based framing was identified (1.00).
  • Subject area: Education structures, integration and community division.
  • The overall probability was at or below the not-flagging threshold.

This is an AI-generated assessment of the text, made against published criteria. It is not a finding of fact about the MLA or their intentions. The Assembly record itself is the fact.

Jev’s structured answers

Probability that each statement is true of this text (0 = no, 1 = yes). A criterion counts as met at 0.60 or above.
QuestionProbabilityMet?
Identity framing0.03No
Sectarian or communal antagonism0.02No
Cultural grievance politics0.03No
Dog-whistle messaging0.02No
Controversy escalation0.03No
Legitimate policy scrutiny0.51No
Overall judgement0.03At or below not-flagging threshold
Context and attribution (stance)
OptionProbability
No identity-based framing (chosen)1.00
Reports or questions it0.00
Criticises or condemns it0.00
Adopts it0.00
Subject area (top five)
SubjectProbability
Education structures, integration and community division0.42
No identity-related subject0.14
Sport (including the GAA), the arts and cultural bodies0.14
Sexism, misogyny, ageism and other equality groups0.13
Flags, emblems, symbols, names and memorials0.09

Assessed 21 October 2026 at 15:35 UTC by jev-1.13.0 (requested as typesafe/jev) under rubric 2026.10-r9, methodology 1.9.

Disagree with this assessment?

Classifications can be challenged. A person reads every challenge, and any change is recorded publicly above with its reason.

Challenge this classification