Debate contribution: Crime and Policing Bill: Legislative Consent Motion

Debate contribution by Ms Connie Egan on .

MLA
Ms Connie Egan
Party at the time
Alliance Party
Date
16 March 2026
Type
Debate contribution
Business
Executive Committee Business
Heading
Crime and Policing Bill: Legislative Consent Motion
Assembly identifier
Official Report component 5449014

Read the official Assembly record

Text

I support the third legislative consent motion that the Alliance Justice Minister, Naomi Long, has brought to the House on Westminster's Crime and Policing Bill. The LCM deals specifically with extending powers that strengthen age verification requirements for the online sale and delivery of knives and crossbows. I commend Minister Long and her departmental officials for moving as swiftly and flexibly as possible on this as a matter of public safety, particularly considering the already packed legislative programme ahead of us. Alliance welcomes the provisions, which clarify and solidify law relating to the need for a physical passport or driving licence as proof of age for the remote sale of a knife or for the remote sale or hire of a crossbow. The amendments also make provision for regulations to prescribe an alternative process for age verification and ensure that all contractors in the delivery chain are responsible for age and ID verification on the delivery of bladed products and crossbows to residential premises. It is a welcome step forward in tightening and regulating access to knives and sharp instruments across Northern Ireland. As noted in the PSNI's crime bulletin that was released just last month, there were 545 crimes involving a knife or sharp instrument between December 2024 and December 2025. Knives or other sharp instruments are recorded as having been used in seven cases of rape and sexual assault in the same period.

Realistically, that only scratches the surface of how frequently knives and sharp instruments are used to harm, intimidate and coerce in domestic settings. We must do all that we can to prevent that from happening, and increased age and identity verifications for knife and crossbow ownership could be a constructive step in that. I hope that all Members across the Chamber will join my party and me and pass the motion.

306 words. Text as published by the Northern Ireland Assembly.

Assessment

Not flagged

Jev’s structured answers met the documented threshold for “not flagged”.

  • Overall probability that the activity is being used to promote, exploit or escalate an identity-based controversy: 0.03 (flagging needs at least 0.70; at or below 0.30 is not flagged).
  • None of the five culture-war criteria was met (each was below 0.60).
  • Assessed as legitimate policy scrutiny (0.85).
  • No identity-based framing was identified (1.00).
  • The overall probability was at or below the not-flagging threshold.

This is an AI-generated assessment of the text, made against published criteria. It is not a finding of fact about the MLA or their intentions. The Assembly record itself is the fact.

Jev’s structured answers

Probability that each statement is true of this text (0 = no, 1 = yes). A criterion counts as met at 0.60 or above.
QuestionProbabilityMet?
Identity framing0.03No
Sectarian or communal antagonism0.02No
Cultural grievance politics0.01No
Dog-whistle messaging0.02No
Controversy escalation0.02No
Legitimate policy scrutiny0.85Yes
Overall judgement0.03At or below not-flagging threshold
Context and attribution (stance)
OptionProbability
No identity-based framing (chosen)1.00
Reports or questions it0.00
Criticises or condemns it0.00
Adopts it0.00
Subject area (top five)
SubjectProbability
No identity-related subject0.41
Sexism, misogyny, ageism and other equality groups0.40
Gender, sexuality, abortion and related social issues0.16
Another identity-related subject0.03
Flags, emblems, symbols, names and memorials0.00

Assessed 21 October 2026 at 15:13 UTC by jev-1.13.0 (requested as typesafe/jev) under rubric 2026.10-r9, methodology 1.9.

Disagree with this assessment?

Classifications can be challenged. A person reads every challenge, and any change is recorded publicly above with its reason.

Challenge this classification