Debate contribution: Independent Environmental Protection Agency

Debate contribution by Mr Eóin Tennyson on .

MLA
Mr Eóin Tennyson
Party at the time
Alliance Party
Date
10 March 2026
Type
Debate contribution
Business
Private Members' Business
Heading
Independent Environmental Protection Agency
Assembly identifier
Official Report component 5437060

Read the official Assembly record

Text

I thank the Member for giving way. Can the Member list one condition that his party extracted for the SDLP's participation in any Executive in the past 20 years? Does he recall the statements that he published when the Programme for Government was under consideration, which said, in effect, that the Alliance Party should just hurry up and agree whatever the DUP and Sinn Féin put in front of them?

70 words. Text as published by the Northern Ireland Assembly.

Assessment

Not flagged

Jev’s structured answers met the documented threshold for “not flagged”.

  • Overall probability that the activity is being used to promote, exploit or escalate an identity-based controversy: 0.37 (flagging needs at least 0.70; at or below 0.30 is not flagged).
  • None of the five culture-war criteria was met (each was below 0.60).
  • No identity-based framing was identified (0.98).
  • The overall probability was low and the text did not adopt any identity-based framing.

This is an AI-generated assessment of the text, made against published criteria. It is not a finding of fact about the MLA or their intentions. The Assembly record itself is the fact.

Jev’s structured answers

Probability that each statement is true of this text (0 = no, 1 = yes). A criterion counts as met at 0.60 or above.
QuestionProbabilityMet?
Identity framing0.24No
Sectarian or communal antagonism0.04No
Cultural grievance politics0.02No
Dog-whistle messaging0.19No
Controversy escalation0.25No
Legitimate policy scrutiny0.11No
Overall judgement0.37Between thresholds
Context and attribution (stance)
OptionProbability
No identity-based framing (chosen)0.98
Reports or questions it0.01
Criticises or condemns it0.00
Adopts it0.01
Subject area (top five)
SubjectProbability
No identity-related subject0.68
Sectarianism, hate crime and community relations0.17
Constitutional question, Brexit, the Windsor Framework and sovereignty0.12
Another identity-related subject0.02
Flags, emblems, symbols, names and memorials0.00

Assessed 21 October 2026 at 15:13 UTC by jev-1.13.0 (requested as typesafe/jev) under rubric 2026.10-r9, methodology 1.9.

Disagree with this assessment?

Classifications can be challenged. A person reads every challenge, and any change is recorded publicly above with its reason.

Challenge this classification