Debate contribution: Parliament Buildings: For Women Scotland Ltd v The Scottish Ministers
Debate contribution by Mr Jonathan Buckley on .
- MLA
- Mr Jonathan Buckley
- Party at the time
- Democratic Unionist Party
- Date
- 10 March 2026
- Type
- Debate contribution
- Business
- Oral Answers to Questions
- Heading
- Parliament Buildings: For Women Scotland Ltd v The Scottish Ministers
- Assembly identifier
- Official Report component 5436567
Read the official Assembly record
Text
It is ridiculous that, in this Building of all buildings, a policy that allows biological men to enter biological females' toilets continues to operate. Did the Commission receive legal advice on the Supreme Court ruling? If so, did that advice recommend the status quo or change?
46 words. Text as published by the Northern Ireland Assembly.
Part of an exchange
This follow-up belongs to: Oral question AQO 3278/22-27.
Assessment
Not analysed
This is the same MLA’s follow-up within the exchange on their own question. It is analysed together with that question and is not counted separately, so one question is never counted twice.
Disagree with this assessment?
Classifications can be challenged. A person reads every challenge, and any change is recorded publicly above with its reason.