Member's statement: St Patrick's Week in Washington DC
Member's statement by Mrs Emma Little-Pengelly on .
- MLA
- Mrs Emma Little-Pengelly
- Party at the time
- Democratic Unionist Party
- Date
- 23 March 2026
- Type
- Member's statement (made as a minister)
- Business
- Members' Statements
- Heading
- St Patrick's Week in Washington DC
- Assembly identifier
- Official Report component 5465220
Read the official Assembly record
Text
St Patrick's week in Washington DC offers unparalleled opportunities to build connections, establish relationships and promote and champion Northern Ireland. Last week, I travelled to Washington DC to engage in more than 22 meetings and events, not just as deputy First Minister but as an advocate for our people, our businesses, our tourism, our academic institutions and our ambition. I went to DC as part of my commitment to keep turning up, standing up and speaking up for Northern Ireland at every opportunity. In a world that is noisy and crowded, if you do not show up, your story does not get told; if you do not stand up, your interests do not get promoted; and, if you do not speak up, others take that opportunity for themselves. Over the course of the five-day visit, I engaged with hundreds of people: key decision-makers from the president to members of his cabinet, leaders on both sides of the aisle in the Senate and the House, business leaders, investors, young people and those with an interest in Northern Ireland. People who believe, as we do, that Northern Ireland is not defined by its past but inspired by its potential. I delivered a clear message: Northern Ireland may be small, but our ambition is not. Let me tell you something: they are listening. They heard how the people from Ulster, what is largely now Northern Ireland, helped build modern America 250 years ago and how the same driving values of hard work, grit, determination and innovation continue to define our people today. They heard how Northern Ireland is a place of innovation and talent, where global companies come not just to invest but to grow. Investors today see Northern Ireland not just as a location but as a launch pad. None of that happens by accident. Progress happens through engagement. It happens when we build relationships not just when it is easy but when it is necessary. It happens when we sit at tables, even with those with whom we might not always agree, and choose dialogue over distance. Relationships are not just soft power but real power. That was something that I was reminded of time and again in Washington. Strong economies are built on trust, and lasting peace is built on understanding. That is our responsibility: to keep reaching outwards and building bridges. Northern Ireland's story is still being written, and we decide what comes next. To our universities, tourism bodies, business organisations, political representatives and community and voluntary leaders, I say a huge "Thank you" for turning up, showing up and speaking up. When we do that together there is no limit to what Northern Ireland can achieve.
448 words. Text as published by the Northern Ireland Assembly.
Assessment
Jev’s structured answers met the documented threshold for “not flagged”.
- Overall probability that the activity is being used to promote, exploit or escalate an identity-based controversy: 0.03 (flagging needs at least 0.70; at or below 0.30 is not flagged).
- None of the five culture-war criteria was met (each was below 0.60).
- No identity-based framing was identified (1.00).
- The overall probability was at or below the not-flagging threshold.
This is an AI-generated assessment of the text, made against published criteria. It is not a finding of fact about the MLA or their intentions. The Assembly record itself is the fact.
Jev’s structured answers
| Question | Probability | Met? |
|---|---|---|
| Identity framing | 0.05 | No |
| Sectarian or communal antagonism | 0.01 | No |
| Cultural grievance politics | 0.02 | No |
| Dog-whistle messaging | 0.02 | No |
| Controversy escalation | 0.03 | No |
| Legitimate policy scrutiny | 0.05 | No |
| Overall judgement | 0.03 | At or below not-flagging threshold |
| Option | Probability |
|---|---|
| No identity-based framing (chosen) | 1.00 |
| Reports or questions it | 0.00 |
| Criticises or condemns it | 0.00 |
| Adopts it | 0.00 |
| Subject | Probability |
|---|---|
| No identity-related subject | 0.40 |
| Another identity-related subject | 0.33 |
| Immigration, asylum, race, ethnicity and Travellers | 0.08 |
| Flags, emblems, symbols, names and memorials | 0.07 |
| Legacy of the Troubles, victims and paramilitarism | 0.05 |
Assessed 21 October 2026 at 15:06 UTC by jev-1.13.0 (requested as typesafe/jev) under rubric 2026.10-r9, methodology 1.9.
Disagree with this assessment?
Classifications can be challenged. A person reads every challenge, and any change is recorded publicly above with its reason.