Debate contribution: Speeding Up Justice Programme
Debate contribution by Mrs Naomi Long on .
- MLA
- Mrs Naomi Long
- Party at the time
- Alliance Party
- Date
- 9 March 2026
- Type
- Debate contribution (made as a minister)
- Business
- Oral Answers to Questions
- Heading
- Speeding Up Justice Programme
- Assembly identifier
- Official Report component 5453240
Read the official Assembly record
Text
Out-of-court disposals are part of the Programme for Government commitment and are central to tackling delay in the criminal justice system, which is under significant pressure due to years of underfunding. Out-of-court disposals have been recognised by Lord Leveson as a central measure to reduce demand on the criminal courts, and stabilise the system, which is at risk of collapse, offering a far faster and more proportionate and cost-effective response to lower-level offending whilst improving victim satisfaction and creating opportunities for early rehabilitation. Out-of-court disposals are long-standing and essential tools to help to divert appropriate cases that involve low-level offending away from prosecution through the courts and ensure that resources are used well. To deal most swiftly with serious cases that are heard in the Crown Court, including murders, serious sexual offence cases and others, we need to create capacity across the system and free up police, prosecutors and courts. It will be vital, therefore, that cases are dealt with proportionately, prosecuted at the right court tier or, if appropriate, dealt with through out-of-court disposal. The measures are not about leniency. They are about delivering the same outcomes but through a shorter measure. Most of the cases that we are talking about for out-of-court disposal will be those that would receive similar outcomes — that is, a monetary penalty — when they go through the courts. In order to get to that point, however, much more resource will have been used by police, prosecutors and the courts. It is important that we are able to get out-of-court disposals progressed because that will, ultimately, underpin much of the rest of the work that we do, and it is our justification for the application and bid to the transformation fund.
288 words. Text as published by the Northern Ireland Assembly.
Assessment
Jev’s structured answers met the documented threshold for “not flagged”.
- Overall probability that the activity is being used to promote, exploit or escalate an identity-based controversy: 0.02 (flagging needs at least 0.70; at or below 0.30 is not flagged).
- None of the five culture-war criteria was met (each was below 0.60).
- Assessed as legitimate policy scrutiny (0.91).
- No identity-based framing was identified (1.00).
- The overall probability was at or below the not-flagging threshold.
This is an AI-generated assessment of the text, made against published criteria. It is not a finding of fact about the MLA or their intentions. The Assembly record itself is the fact.
Jev’s structured answers
| Question | Probability | Met? |
|---|---|---|
| Identity framing | 0.02 | No |
| Sectarian or communal antagonism | 0.02 | No |
| Cultural grievance politics | 0.01 | No |
| Dog-whistle messaging | 0.02 | No |
| Controversy escalation | 0.02 | No |
| Legitimate policy scrutiny | 0.91 | Yes |
| Overall judgement | 0.02 | At or below not-flagging threshold |
| Option | Probability |
|---|---|
| No identity-based framing (chosen) | 1.00 |
| Reports or questions it | 0.00 |
| Criticises or condemns it | 0.00 |
| Adopts it | 0.00 |
| Subject | Probability |
|---|---|
| No identity-related subject | 1.00 |
| Flags, emblems, symbols, names and memorials | 0.00 |
| Parades, bonfires and commemorations | 0.00 |
| Irish language, Ulster-Scots and language policy | 0.00 |
| Sport (including the GAA), the arts and cultural bodies | 0.00 |
Assessed 21 October 2026 at 15:05 UTC by jev-1.13.0 (requested as typesafe/jev) under rubric 2026.10-r9, methodology 1.9.
Disagree with this assessment?
Classifications can be challenged. A person reads every challenge, and any change is recorded publicly above with its reason.