Member's statement: Endometriosis

Member's statement by Mrs Ciara Ferguson on .

MLA
Mrs Ciara Ferguson
Party at the time
Sinn Féin
Date
3 March 2026
Type
Member's statement
Business
Members' Statements
Heading
Endometriosis
Assembly identifier
Official Report component 5434417

Read the official Assembly record

Text

Women across Ireland deserve access to timely, accessible and good care for endometriosis. Endometriosis has, for too long, been misunderstood and misaddressed. I was pleased, therefore, to secure confirmation from the Health Minister that plans and investment for endometriosis services will commence in 2026. Delays in diagnosis and treatment for endometriosis can lead to chronic pelvic pain, infertility problems, fatigue and lasting damage to women's health due to long-term complications. That does not even cover the significant impacts of endometriosis pain on women's daily lives and activities and the toll on their mental health and well-being. Endometriosis can affect multiple organs and cause complex symptoms. Multidisciplinary specialist services and coordinated care must be urgently provided. Access to gynaecologists, fertility specialists, incision and colorectal surgeons, urologists, pain management services, pelvic health physiologists and others are fundamental to helping women living with endometriosis. That will improve symptom control, reduce the risks of repeated surgery and support long-term quality of life. Sinn Féin has consistently advocated compassionate, informed care for endometriosis and worked to tackle systemic failures, stigma and inequality in access to women's healthcare. I commend the work of the Derry Well Women endometriosis support group for its consistent and strong advocacy over the years. As we approach International Women's Day on Sunday and in this endometriosis awareness month, I reiterate our party's support for closing the gender health gap and ensuring that all women have access to the care that they need, no matter where they are.

246 words. Text as published by the Northern Ireland Assembly.

Assessment

Not flagged

Jev’s structured answers met the documented threshold for “not flagged”.

  • Overall probability that the activity is being used to promote, exploit or escalate an identity-based controversy: 0.03 (flagging needs at least 0.70; at or below 0.30 is not flagged).
  • None of the five culture-war criteria was met (each was below 0.60).
  • Assessed as legitimate policy scrutiny (0.92).
  • No identity-based framing was identified (1.00).
  • Subject area: Gender, sexuality, abortion and related social issues.
  • The overall probability was at or below the not-flagging threshold.

This is an AI-generated assessment of the text, made against published criteria. It is not a finding of fact about the MLA or their intentions. The Assembly record itself is the fact.

Jev’s structured answers

Probability that each statement is true of this text (0 = no, 1 = yes). A criterion counts as met at 0.60 or above.
QuestionProbabilityMet?
Identity framing0.05No
Sectarian or communal antagonism0.02No
Cultural grievance politics0.01No
Dog-whistle messaging0.01No
Controversy escalation0.02No
Legitimate policy scrutiny0.92Yes
Overall judgement0.03At or below not-flagging threshold
Context and attribution (stance)
OptionProbability
No identity-based framing (chosen)1.00
Reports or questions it0.00
Criticises or condemns it0.00
Adopts it0.00
Subject area (top five)
SubjectProbability
Gender, sexuality, abortion and related social issues0.73
Sexism, misogyny, ageism and other equality groups0.27
No identity-related subject0.00
Flags, emblems, symbols, names and memorials0.00
Parades, bonfires and commemorations0.00

Assessed 21 October 2026 at 15:01 UTC by jev-1.13.0 (requested as typesafe/jev) under rubric 2026.10-r9, methodology 1.9.

Disagree with this assessment?

Classifications can be challenged. A person reads every challenge, and any change is recorded publicly above with its reason.

Challenge this classification