Debate contribution: Irish Presidency of the Council of the European Union

Debate contribution by Mr David Brooks on .

MLA
Mr David Brooks
Party at the time
Democratic Unionist Party
Date
2 March 2026
Type
Debate contribution
Business
Private Members' Business
Heading
Irish Presidency of the Council of the European Union
Assembly identifier
Official Report component 5433313

Read the official Assembly record

Text

I attempted to intervene some way back, when I was going to say that the Member may not realise that I am a unionist. She talks about opportunities: this is also an opportunity for us all to get behind defending Europe from its key threats. Will she join us in that?

51 words. Text as published by the Northern Ireland Assembly.

Assessment

Not flagged

Jev’s structured answers met the documented threshold for “not flagged”.

  • Overall probability that the activity is being used to promote, exploit or escalate an identity-based controversy: 0.40 (flagging needs at least 0.70; at or below 0.30 is not flagged).
  • None of the five culture-war criteria was met (each was below 0.60).
  • No identity-based framing was identified (0.75).
  • Subject area: Constitutional question, Brexit, the Windsor Framework and sovereignty.
  • The overall probability was low and the text did not adopt any identity-based framing.

This is an AI-generated assessment of the text, made against published criteria. It is not a finding of fact about the MLA or their intentions. The Assembly record itself is the fact.

Jev’s structured answers

Probability that each statement is true of this text (0 = no, 1 = yes). A criterion counts as met at 0.60 or above.
QuestionProbabilityMet?
Identity framing0.42No
Sectarian or communal antagonism0.04No
Cultural grievance politics0.05No
Dog-whistle messaging0.14No
Controversy escalation0.39No
Legitimate policy scrutiny0.13No
Overall judgement0.40Between thresholds
Context and attribution (stance)
OptionProbability
No identity-based framing (chosen)0.75
Reports or questions it0.04
Criticises or condemns it0.00
Adopts it0.21
Subject area (top five)
SubjectProbability
Constitutional question, Brexit, the Windsor Framework and sovereignty0.65
Sectarianism, hate crime and community relations0.24
Another identity-related subject0.09
No identity-related subject0.01
Legacy of the Troubles, victims and paramilitarism0.01

Assessed 21 October 2026 at 15:00 UTC by jev-1.13.0 (requested as typesafe/jev) under rubric 2026.10-r9, methodology 1.9.

Disagree with this assessment?

Classifications can be challenged. A person reads every challenge, and any change is recorded publicly above with its reason.

Challenge this classification