Member's statement: St Patrick's Day: US Visit
Member's statement by Mr Jonathan Buckley on .
- MLA
- Mr Jonathan Buckley
- Party at the time
- Democratic Unionist Party
- Date
- 23 February 2026
- Type
- Member's statement
- Business
- Members' Statements
- Heading
- St Patrick's Day: US Visit
- Assembly identifier
- Official Report component 5399655
Read the official Assembly record
Text
There has been a certain irony in recent days that will not be lost on the people of Northern Ireland. We had Sinn Féin claiming that it is boycotting a visit to the White House on St Patrick's Day, only for it to be later clarified that it was not, in fact, invited in the first place.
It seems a bit elementary to point out to Sinn Féin Members that you cannot boycott an event that you have not been invited to. Sinn Féin's duplicity continues to be called out. Let us remember why Mary Lou McDonald and Michelle O'Neill told us they would not attend St Patrick's Day in the White House: they were going to take a principled position against President Trump and his Administration. Well, it would appear that that so-called position of principle is easily traded on the back of a $100 note. This weekend's 'Sunday Times' says it best: it reveals that Sinn Féin has continued with record donations to President Trump's Republican Party during his time as president. It states:
"The president of Sinn Fein's US fundraising arm sharply increased political donations to Republican candidates during President Trump's time in office".
How brass-necked can you get? Where is the accountability? Nothing is louder than the echo of a mask slipping, especially when the face beneath it contradicts every word that they continue to say in public. By contrast, the DUP will be in Washington. We will stand up and speak out for the people of Northern Ireland, progressing and promoting business and progressing and strengthening the economic ties to and relationships with the largest economy in the world and one of our greatest allies: the United States. It is an opportunity that we will seize and not squander. The ties between Ulster and the United States are great. We have to look only at the recent contribution by the US Secretary of State, Marco Rubio, when he paid tribute to the frontier men of Scots-Irish descent and many proud Irish descendants who made America their home and made it great today. He talked about that:
"hardy clan from the hills of Ulster".
We are certainly proud of their contribution and will continue to mark it every time that we can. Perhaps, in some respects, it is best that Sinn Féin does not attend —
— because everything that they put their hand to with their hard-left rhetoric —
— costs jobs and reputation to the Northern Ireland economy. We will proudly stand up for Northern Ireland's interests.
423 words. Text as published by the Northern Ireland Assembly.
Assessment
Not flagged on a second assessment, because Jev’s answers did not settle it. The reasons are given below.
- Overall probability that the activity is being used to promote, exploit or escalate an identity-based controversy: 0.50 (flagging needs at least 0.70; at or below 0.30 is not flagged).
- Criteria met: Controversy escalation (0.70).
- No identity-based framing was identified (0.57).
- Subject area: Immigration, asylum, race, ethnicity and Travellers.
- The answers did not meet either automatic threshold.
This is an AI-generated assessment of the text, made against published criteria. It is not a finding of fact about the MLA or their intentions. The Assembly record itself is the fact.
Second assessment
Jev’s answers did not settle this record, so a second model, claude-opus-5-5, read the same text (without the MLA’s name or party) and gave its reasons on 21 October 2026. How the second assessment works
- Verdict
- Not flagged
- Public interest or divisiveness
- Mixed
Against the published rubric
The statement is a sharp party-political attack, accusing a named party of "duplicity" over a claimed White House boycott and of donations to US Republicans, and calling it "brass-necked" with "hard-left rhetoric". The rubric counts attacks on a party as culture-war activity only when they are identity-based, such as accusing it of bigotry or of hostility towards a community. Here the charge is hypocrisy and economic damage, not identity. The reference to the "hardy clan from the hills of Ulster" expresses pride in Ulster-Scots heritage without disparaging any other tradition, and St Patrick's Day is the occasion rather than the object of any cultural grievance.
Public interest or divisiveness
The statement does not advance identity-based division: it does not portray a community, culture or tradition as a threat or contest anyone's place in public life. It is, however, largely partisan point-scoring, with only a thin public-interest element in promoting economic ties with the United States. The rivalry between the parties is mapped onto the familiar communal divide, so the tone adds to political antagonism even though the substance is not about identity.
Jev’s structured answers
| Question | Probability | Met? |
|---|---|---|
| Identity framing | 0.46 | No |
| Sectarian or communal antagonism | 0.20 | No |
| Cultural grievance politics | 0.05 | No |
| Dog-whistle messaging | 0.51 | No |
| Controversy escalation | 0.70 | Yes |
| Legitimate policy scrutiny | 0.10 | No |
| Overall judgement | 0.50 | Between thresholds |
| Option | Probability |
|---|---|
| No identity-based framing (chosen) | 0.57 |
| Reports or questions it | 0.01 |
| Criticises or condemns it | 0.00 |
| Adopts it | 0.42 |
| Subject | Probability |
|---|---|
| Immigration, asylum, race, ethnicity and Travellers | 0.42 |
| Another identity-related subject | 0.28 |
| Sectarianism, hate crime and community relations | 0.17 |
| No identity-related subject | 0.06 |
| Irish language, Ulster-Scots and language policy | 0.02 |
Assessed 21 October 2026 at 14:57 UTC by jev-1.13.0 (requested as typesafe/jev) under rubric 2026.10-r9, methodology 1.9.
Disagree with this assessment?
Classifications can be challenged. A person reads every challenge, and any change is recorded publicly above with its reason.