Debate contribution: USA-NI250

Debate contribution by Mr David Brooks on .

MLA
Mr David Brooks
Party at the time
Democratic Unionist Party
Date
17 February 2026
Type
Debate contribution
Business
Oral Answers to Questions
Heading
USA-NI250
Assembly identifier
Official Report component 5394825

Read the official Assembly record

Text

I welcome the Minister's work on the issue and his leadership in going out to Washington in March. It was great to hear Secretary of State Rubio mention the connection with the Scotch Irish or Ulster Scots in a speech last week. That speaks to the influence of some of the work that has been done. Does the Minister welcome the joint proposal by the SDLP and the DUP to support the erection of a statue of John Dunlap?

79 words. Text as published by the Northern Ireland Assembly.

Assessment

Not flagged

Jev’s structured answers met the documented threshold for “not flagged”.

  • Overall probability that the activity is being used to promote, exploit or escalate an identity-based controversy: 0.17 (flagging needs at least 0.70; at or below 0.30 is not flagged).
  • None of the five culture-war criteria was met (each was below 0.60).
  • No identity-based framing was identified (0.93).
  • Subject area: Irish language, Ulster-Scots and language policy.
  • The overall probability was at or below the not-flagging threshold.

This is an AI-generated assessment of the text, made against published criteria. It is not a finding of fact about the MLA or their intentions. The Assembly record itself is the fact.

Jev’s structured answers

Probability that each statement is true of this text (0 = no, 1 = yes). A criterion counts as met at 0.60 or above.
QuestionProbabilityMet?
Identity framing0.15No
Sectarian or communal antagonism0.02No
Cultural grievance politics0.15No
Dog-whistle messaging0.03No
Controversy escalation0.24No
Legitimate policy scrutiny0.21No
Overall judgement0.17At or below not-flagging threshold
Context and attribution (stance)
OptionProbability
No identity-based framing (chosen)0.93
Reports or questions it0.05
Criticises or condemns it0.00
Adopts it0.02
Subject area (top five)
SubjectProbability
Irish language, Ulster-Scots and language policy0.68
Flags, emblems, symbols, names and memorials0.16
Another identity-related subject0.11
Immigration, asylum, race, ethnicity and Travellers0.02
Sectarianism, hate crime and community relations0.02

Assessed 21 October 2026 at 14:52 UTC by jev-1.13.0 (requested as typesafe/jev) under rubric 2026.10-r9, methodology 1.9.

Disagree with this assessment?

Classifications can be challenged. A person reads every challenge, and any change is recorded publicly above with its reason.

Challenge this classification