Debate contribution: Ministerial Code of Conduct

Debate contribution by Mr Eóin Tennyson on .

MLA
Mr Eóin Tennyson
Party at the time
Alliance Party
Date
10 February 2026
Type
Debate contribution
Business
Opposition Business
Heading
Ministerial Code of Conduct
Assembly identifier
Official Report component 5435446

Read the official Assembly record

Text

I thank the Member for giving way. It was the leader of the Ulster Unionist Party who made that assertion. Does he agree that, given that the Ulster Unionist Party has a councillor on Derry City and Strabane District Council who has three drink-driving convictions, perhaps that Member should get his own house in order before casting aspersions on other parties?

61 words. Text as published by the Northern Ireland Assembly.

Assessment

Not flagged

Jev’s structured answers met the documented threshold for “not flagged”.

  • Overall probability that the activity is being used to promote, exploit or escalate an identity-based controversy: 0.31 (flagging needs at least 0.70; at or below 0.30 is not flagged).
  • None of the five culture-war criteria was met (each was below 0.60).
  • No identity-based framing was identified (0.96).
  • The overall probability was low and the text did not adopt any identity-based framing.

This is an AI-generated assessment of the text, made against published criteria. It is not a finding of fact about the MLA or their intentions. The Assembly record itself is the fact.

Jev’s structured answers

Probability that each statement is true of this text (0 = no, 1 = yes). A criterion counts as met at 0.60 or above.
QuestionProbabilityMet?
Identity framing0.24No
Sectarian or communal antagonism0.06No
Cultural grievance politics0.02No
Dog-whistle messaging0.26No
Controversy escalation0.34No
Legitimate policy scrutiny0.06No
Overall judgement0.31Between thresholds
Context and attribution (stance)
OptionProbability
No identity-based framing (chosen)0.96
Reports or questions it0.00
Criticises or condemns it0.00
Adopts it0.04
Subject area (top five)
SubjectProbability
No identity-related subject0.83
Sectarianism, hate crime and community relations0.09
Another identity-related subject0.04
Constitutional question, Brexit, the Windsor Framework and sovereignty0.02
Flags, emblems, symbols, names and memorials0.01

Assessed 21 October 2026 at 14:51 UTC by jev-1.13.0 (requested as typesafe/jev) under rubric 2026.10-r9, methodology 1.9.

Disagree with this assessment?

Classifications can be challenged. A person reads every challenge, and any change is recorded publicly above with its reason.

Challenge this classification