Member's statement: Aware: 30th Anniversary

Member's statement by Mr Justin McNulty on .

MLA
Mr Justin McNulty
Party at the time
Social Democratic and Labour Party
Date
10 February 2026
Type
Member's statement
Business
Members' Statements
Heading
Aware: 30th Anniversary
Assembly identifier
Official Report component 5435191

Read the official Assembly record

Text

It is an honour for me to speak in celebration of a hugely significant milestone: the 30th anniversary of Aware, an organisation that has played a crucial role in improving mental health awareness and understanding, and providing support, education and hope across the North. Thirty years ago, the landscape around mental health looked very different. Conversations about depression, anxiety and bipolar disorder were avoided. People who were suffering faced stigma, isolation and a lack of support. In 1996, at a time when services were underdeveloped and public understanding was limited, a small group gathered in a living room in Derry with a shared determination to help and support people living with mental illness. From that conversation grew an organisation built on a simple but powerful purpose: no one should have to face mental ill health alone. From humble beginnings, Aware was established as a charity grounded in lived experience, peer support and hope. Over the past three decades, Aware has grown to host 24 weekly volunteer-led support groups, alongside education and early intervention programmes that now reach thousands of people every year.

It is impossible to mark this anniversary without paying tribute to the volunteers who are at the heart of Aware. Individuals give their time in the evenings and at weekends and listen without judgement. They create safe spaces for people at some of the most difficult moments in their lives. Many bring their lived experience. The fuel for their fire is often the personal challenges that they have overcome that enable them to be compassionate, empathetic and supportive and to be bringers of light for others. I also acknowledge the staff, trustees, supporters and partners who have ensured that Aware has continued to grow and respond to changing needs, particularly in recent years when demand for mental health support has increased significantly. Their work has helped to ensure that mental health remains not just a health issue but a societal priority. While progress has been made, challenges remain in ensuring timely access to services and in continuing to break down the stigma. Organisations such as Aware are essential partners in that journey, strengthening communities through prevention, education and support and providing a lifeline and a lighted path in a safe and welcoming non-clinical environment. Today, I place on record my sincere thanks and those of my party, and, I am sure, of every Member in the House, to everyone who has contributed to Aware's journey: its volunteers, its staff and all those who have had the courage to seek —

— help and, in doing so, have helped others to do the same.

435 words. Text as published by the Northern Ireland Assembly.

Assessment

Not flagged

Jev’s structured answers met the documented threshold for “not flagged”.

  • Overall probability that the activity is being used to promote, exploit or escalate an identity-based controversy: 0.02 (flagging needs at least 0.70; at or below 0.30 is not flagged).
  • None of the five culture-war criteria was met (each was below 0.60).
  • No identity-based framing was identified (1.00).
  • Subject area: Disability (including neurodivergence and mental health), disabled people and disability or sickness benefits.
  • The overall probability was at or below the not-flagging threshold.

This is an AI-generated assessment of the text, made against published criteria. It is not a finding of fact about the MLA or their intentions. The Assembly record itself is the fact.

Jev’s structured answers

Probability that each statement is true of this text (0 = no, 1 = yes). A criterion counts as met at 0.60 or above.
QuestionProbabilityMet?
Identity framing0.02No
Sectarian or communal antagonism0.01No
Cultural grievance politics0.01No
Dog-whistle messaging0.01No
Controversy escalation0.02No
Legitimate policy scrutiny0.09No
Overall judgement0.02At or below not-flagging threshold
Context and attribution (stance)
OptionProbability
No identity-based framing (chosen)1.00
Reports or questions it0.00
Criticises or condemns it0.00
Adopts it0.00
Subject area (top five)
SubjectProbability
Disability (including neurodivergence and mental health), disabled people and disability or sickness benefits1.00
No identity-related subject0.00
Flags, emblems, symbols, names and memorials0.00
Parades, bonfires and commemorations0.00
Irish language, Ulster-Scots and language policy0.00

Assessed 21 October 2026 at 14:33 UTC by jev-1.13.0 (requested as typesafe/jev) under rubric 2026.10-r9, methodology 1.9.

Disagree with this assessment?

Classifications can be challenged. A person reads every challenge, and any change is recorded publicly above with its reason.

Challenge this classification