Member's statement: An Roghnú ar Bhonn Acadúil
Member's statement by Mr Pat Sheehan on .
- MLA
- Mr Pat Sheehan
- Party at the time
- Sinn Féin
- Date
- 9 February 2026
- Type
- Member's statement
- Business
- Members' Statements
- Heading
- An Roghnú ar Bhonn Acadúil
- Assembly identifier
- Official Report component 5368994
Read the official Assembly record
Text
Seachtain Mheabhairshláinte na bPáistí an tseachtain seo. Is é téama fheachtas na bliana seo ná "Seo M’Áitse", agus is é is aidhm dó a chinntiú go mothaíonn páistí agus daoine óga go bhfuil áit acu sa tsochaí. Ba chóir do gach páiste a mhothú go bhfuil meas orthu agus go bhfuil tacaíocht acu sa chóras oideachais againn. Déanann an roghnú ar bhonn acadúil a mhalairt; diúltú acadúil atá ann. Níl aon áit ag an teist aistrithe i gcóras oideachais nua-aimseartha cuimsitheach. In áit a bheith ag cuidiú le páistí a n-áit a aimsiú, is amhlaidh a scarann sí iad. Deirtear le cuid páistí "Tá libh", agus le páistí eile "Tá sibh ó rath", fiú sula bhfágann siad an bhunscoil. Cuirtear barraíocht brú ar pháistí agus iad 10 nó 11 bhliain d’aois. Bíonn imní ar pháistí san am roimh an teist aistrithe, agus cuireann na torthaí imní orthu fosta, go háirithe ar pháistí ó chúlraí faoi mhíbhuntáiste. Ní bhíonn deireadh leis an imní sin ar lá na dtorthaí; leanann sí cuid mhór páistí ar feadh na mblianta, ag baint faoina bhféinmhuinín agus ag dul faoina meabhairshláinte agus faoin dearcadh atá acu ar an fhoghlaim. Is léir ón taighde an dochar a dhéanann an roghnú ar bhonn acadúil. Creideann tromlach mór na múinteoirí go bhfuil tionchar diúltach ag an teist aistrithe ar mheabhairshláinte na bpáistí, agus má deirtear linn gur sháraigh orainn agus muid óg, téann sin faoinár bhféinmheas agus faoin éifeacht a dhéanfaidh muid. Má tá muid dáiríre faoi mheabhairshláinte na bpáistí a chosaint, caithfear an roghnú ar bhonn acadúil a chur ar ceal anois — faoi dheireadh thiar thall.
269 words. Text as published by the Northern Ireland Assembly.
Assessment
Jev’s structured answers met the documented threshold for “not flagged”.
- Overall probability that the activity is being used to promote, exploit or escalate an identity-based controversy: 0.05 (flagging needs at least 0.70; at or below 0.30 is not flagged).
- None of the five culture-war criteria was met (each was below 0.60).
- Assessed as legitimate policy scrutiny (0.90).
- No identity-based framing was identified (0.99).
- Subject area: Education structures, integration and community division.
- The overall probability was at or below the not-flagging threshold.
This is an AI-generated assessment of the text, made against published criteria. It is not a finding of fact about the MLA or their intentions. The Assembly record itself is the fact.
Jev’s structured answers
| Question | Probability | Met? |
|---|---|---|
| Identity framing | 0.04 | No |
| Sectarian or communal antagonism | 0.02 | No |
| Cultural grievance politics | 0.02 | No |
| Dog-whistle messaging | 0.03 | No |
| Controversy escalation | 0.04 | No |
| Legitimate policy scrutiny | 0.90 | Yes |
| Overall judgement | 0.05 | At or below not-flagging threshold |
| Option | Probability |
|---|---|
| No identity-based framing (chosen) | 0.99 |
| Reports or questions it | 0.00 |
| Criticises or condemns it | 0.01 |
| Adopts it | 0.00 |
| Subject | Probability |
|---|---|
| Education structures, integration and community division | 0.79 |
| Disability (including neurodivergence and mental health), disabled people and disability or sickness benefits | 0.14 |
| No identity-related subject | 0.04 |
| Sexism, misogyny, ageism and other equality groups | 0.02 |
| Gender, sexuality, abortion and related social issues | 0.01 |
Assessed 21 October 2026 at 14:31 UTC by jev-1.13.0 (requested as typesafe/jev) under rubric 2026.10-r9, methodology 1.9.
Disagree with this assessment?
Classifications can be challenged. A person reads every challenge, and any change is recorded publicly above with its reason.