Debate contribution: Academic Selection

Debate contribution by Mr Peter Martin on .

MLA
Mr Peter Martin
Party at the time
Democratic Unionist Party
Date
3 February 2026
Type
Debate contribution
Business
Private Members' Business
Heading
Academic Selection
Assembly identifier
Official Report component 5363000

Read the official Assembly record

Text

I do not want to incur your wrath, Pat. You espouse the education system in the South. I agree that the delivering equality of opportunity in schools (DEIS) programme has done a really good job, but do you want to see an education system in Northern Ireland that has 35 times more private schools than there are currently? Is that the system that you aspire to?

66 words. Text as published by the Northern Ireland Assembly.

Assessment

Not flagged

Jev’s structured answers met the documented threshold for “not flagged”.

  • Overall probability that the activity is being used to promote, exploit or escalate an identity-based controversy: 0.43 (flagging needs at least 0.70; at or below 0.30 is not flagged).
  • None of the five culture-war criteria was met (each was below 0.60).
  • No identity-based framing was identified (0.71).
  • Subject area: Education structures, integration and community division.
  • The overall probability was low and the text did not adopt any identity-based framing.

This is an AI-generated assessment of the text, made against published criteria. It is not a finding of fact about the MLA or their intentions. The Assembly record itself is the fact.

Jev’s structured answers

Probability that each statement is true of this text (0 = no, 1 = yes). A criterion counts as met at 0.60 or above.
QuestionProbabilityMet?
Identity framing0.19No
Sectarian or communal antagonism0.07No
Cultural grievance politics0.07No
Dog-whistle messaging0.40No
Controversy escalation0.40No
Legitimate policy scrutiny0.34No
Overall judgement0.43Between thresholds
Context and attribution (stance)
OptionProbability
No identity-based framing (chosen)0.71
Reports or questions it0.01
Criticises or condemns it0.00
Adopts it0.28
Subject area (top five)
SubjectProbability
Education structures, integration and community division0.80
No identity-related subject0.17
Constitutional question, Brexit, the Windsor Framework and sovereignty0.02
Sectarianism, hate crime and community relations0.01
Flags, emblems, symbols, names and memorials0.00

Assessed 21 October 2026 at 14:30 UTC by jev-1.13.0 (requested as typesafe/jev) under rubric 2026.10-r9, methodology 1.9.

Disagree with this assessment?

Classifications can be challenged. A person reads every challenge, and any change is recorded publicly above with its reason.

Challenge this classification