Debate contribution: Arts Strategy: Budget 2026-29/2030
Debate contribution by Mr Matthew O'Toole on .
- MLA
- Mr Matthew O'Toole
- Party at the time
- Social Democratic and Labour Party
- Date
- 26 January 2026
- Type
- Debate contribution
- Business
- Oral Answers to Questions
- Heading
- Arts Strategy: Budget 2026-29/2030
- Assembly identifier
- Official Report component 5340717
Read the official Assembly record
Text
Minister, you and your party colleagues have not been behind the door in criticising the multi-year Budget from the Finance Minister. That is fine: neither has my party, but we are the official Opposition. Shamefully, real spending on arts in this jurisdiction is by far the lowest in these islands. It has fallen by nearly half in real terms over the past decade and a half. Meanwhile, in England, in the past week or two, we have seen a £1·5 billion commitment to the arts at a UK level. Minister, you and your party are keen to talk about alignment with the rest of the UK: have you made a specific request that at least some of the Barnett consequential connected to that be devoted to arts here?
128 words. Text as published by the Northern Ireland Assembly.
Part of an exchange
This follow-up belongs to: Oral question AQO 2987/22-27.
Assessment
Not analysed
This is the same MLA’s follow-up within the exchange on their own question. It is analysed together with that question and is not counted separately, so one question is never counted twice.
Disagree with this assessment?
Classifications can be challenged. A person reads every challenge, and any change is recorded publicly above with its reason.