Member's statement: Reval2026: Hospitality Sector

Member's statement by Mr Matthew O'Toole on .

MLA
Mr Matthew O'Toole
Party at the time
Social Democratic and Labour Party
Date
26 January 2026
Type
Member's statement
Business
Members' Statements
Heading
Reval2026: Hospitality Sector
Assembly identifier
Official Report component 5340164

Read the official Assembly record

Text

I will talk about a subject that is close not just to my heart but to the hearts of many communities and people who value the role that our pub and hospitality sector plays in Northern Ireland. I grew up working in small rural pubs. It is part of the DNA of my family and that of many families across the island. The revaluation that was announced last week by the Department of Finance risks forcing pubs and other hospitality locations over the edge. In an extraordinary development, many of our hospitality venues will face tens of thousands of pounds — in some cases, hundreds of thousands of pounds — in increased rates liability. That will force them out of business: it will force pubs to close; it will prevent small rural villages and towns from having access to those vital community meeting points; and it will damage our hospitality offer. The Irish pub is fundamental and critical to the hospitality offer not just in the North but on the island of Ireland. The revaluation exercise happens every number of years. It is not a revenue-raising exercise, so, before anybody says, "Where else would we raise the revenue?", let us be clear that it is a revenue-neutral exercise. That is clear from the Minister and from the Department's website. However, that revenue-neutral exercise has clearly been designed to create a huge additional burden on our pubs and hospitality sector at a time when it faces rising costs related to labour, goods and other things such as Sky TV. That last aspect does not necessarily jump to the front of one's mind, but my understanding is that the Sky Sports bills — Sky Sports subscriptions are often critical to getting people into pubs, including on wintry nights such as we have been having recently, when people go in to watch the Champions League — that pubs pay to get that critical part of their offer, are based on their rateable values, so those bills will go up by thousands of pounds. That is a completely unacceptable situation. The SDLP Opposition will not stand by and allow our pubs to be punished like that, with all the consequences for their workers — they could lose their jobs — communities and our tourism offer. It is not good enough to blame the Brits, as some have already done, and to say, "Austerity did this". The revaluation is not raising any money. If it were raising money for public services, that would be another matter. The Sinn Féin MP for North Belfast responded to a pub on the Antrim Road that is facing crippling additional costs by saying, "It is a consequence of austerity". The revaluation is not raising any money to deal with austerity; it is just rebalancing our rates system while punishing pubs. We cannot stand by and let that happen. We cannot allow small rural pubs and critical hospitality venues to go to the wall because of the revaluation. We will stand up and fight against it in order to protect those critical community assets and tourism resources. There will be more to say about that in the Chamber in the weeks ahead.

532 words. Text as published by the Northern Ireland Assembly.

Assessment

Not flagged

Jev’s structured answers met the documented threshold for “not flagged”.

  • Overall probability that the activity is being used to promote, exploit or escalate an identity-based controversy: 0.10 (flagging needs at least 0.70; at or below 0.30 is not flagged).
  • None of the five culture-war criteria was met (each was below 0.60).
  • Assessed as legitimate policy scrutiny (0.92).
  • No identity-based framing was identified (0.73).
  • The overall probability was at or below the not-flagging threshold.

This is an AI-generated assessment of the text, made against published criteria. It is not a finding of fact about the MLA or their intentions. The Assembly record itself is the fact.

Jev’s structured answers

Probability that each statement is true of this text (0 = no, 1 = yes). A criterion counts as met at 0.60 or above.
QuestionProbabilityMet?
Identity framing0.08No
Sectarian or communal antagonism0.03No
Cultural grievance politics0.03No
Dog-whistle messaging0.06No
Controversy escalation0.07No
Legitimate policy scrutiny0.92Yes
Overall judgement0.10At or below not-flagging threshold
Context and attribution (stance)
OptionProbability
No identity-based framing (chosen)0.73
Reports or questions it0.06
Criticises or condemns it0.20
Adopts it0.01
Subject area (top five)
SubjectProbability
No identity-related subject0.57
Sport (including the GAA), the arts and cultural bodies0.19
Constitutional question, Brexit, the Windsor Framework and sovereignty0.16
Sectarianism, hate crime and community relations0.04
Another identity-related subject0.03

Assessed 21 October 2026 at 14:23 UTC by jev-1.13.0 (requested as typesafe/jev) under rubric 2026.10-r9, methodology 1.9.

Disagree with this assessment?

Classifications can be challenged. A person reads every challenge, and any change is recorded publicly above with its reason.

Challenge this classification