Debate contribution: Miscarriage: Statutory Paid Leave

Debate contribution by Dr Caoimhe Archibald on .

MLA
Dr Caoimhe Archibald
Party at the time
Sinn Féin
Date
27 January 2026
Type
Debate contribution (made as a minister)
Business
Oral Answers to Questions
Heading
Miscarriage: Statutory Paid Leave
Assembly identifier
Official Report component 5345233

Read the official Assembly record

Text

I thank the Member for her question. I agree with her about the introduction of carer's leave. There is broad support across the Assembly for that, and it is a really important for the many people out there who provide really important care for loved ones. As I indicated at Committee last week, the drafting of the 'good jobs' Bill is well advanced. We are working to make sure that it is introduced in the Assembly at the earliest opportunity. As we indicated last week, we are hopeful that that will be before the end of March.

97 words. Text as published by the Northern Ireland Assembly.

Assessment

Not flagged

Jev’s structured answers met the documented threshold for “not flagged”.

  • Overall probability that the activity is being used to promote, exploit or escalate an identity-based controversy: 0.02 (flagging needs at least 0.70; at or below 0.30 is not flagged).
  • None of the five culture-war criteria was met (each was below 0.60).
  • No identity-based framing was identified (1.00).
  • The overall probability was at or below the not-flagging threshold.

This is an AI-generated assessment of the text, made against published criteria. It is not a finding of fact about the MLA or their intentions. The Assembly record itself is the fact.

Jev’s structured answers

Probability that each statement is true of this text (0 = no, 1 = yes). A criterion counts as met at 0.60 or above.
QuestionProbabilityMet?
Identity framing0.02No
Sectarian or communal antagonism0.01No
Cultural grievance politics0.01No
Dog-whistle messaging0.01No
Controversy escalation0.02No
Legitimate policy scrutiny0.50No
Overall judgement0.02At or below not-flagging threshold
Context and attribution (stance)
OptionProbability
No identity-based framing (chosen)1.00
Reports or questions it0.00
Criticises or condemns it0.00
Adopts it0.00
Subject area (top five)
SubjectProbability
No identity-related subject0.52
Gender, sexuality, abortion and related social issues0.38
Sexism, misogyny, ageism and other equality groups0.06
Disability (including neurodivergence and mental health), disabled people and disability or sickness benefits0.03
Another identity-related subject0.01

Assessed 21 October 2026 at 14:21 UTC by jev-1.13.0 (requested as typesafe/jev) under rubric 2026.10-r9, methodology 1.9.

Disagree with this assessment?

Classifications can be challenged. A person reads every challenge, and any change is recorded publicly above with its reason.

Challenge this classification