Debate contribution: Integrated Education: Demand

Debate contribution by Mr Paul Givan on .

MLA
Mr Paul Givan
Party at the time
Democratic Unionist Party
Date
12 January 2026
Type
Debate contribution (made as a minister)
Business
Oral Answers to Questions
Heading
Integrated Education: Demand
Assembly identifier
Official Report component 5311388

Read the official Assembly record

Text

I attended New-Bridge Integrated College, just before Christmas. I believed very much that it was a real thing due to the wide diversity of sporting and cultural activities in which the children there were being given an opportunity to participate. It was also able to demonstrate a balanced 40:40:20 split when it came to the demographics. It was at pains to make the case to me that it was integrated not just in name but when it came to pupil catchment, enrolment and the diversity of curricular activities that it provided. That is not the case in every integrated school. Often, those that have transformed from controlled to controlled integrated have not been able to follow that through when it comes to the diversity of pupil enrolment. There is a challenge there. New schools have been able to demonstrate what many would regard as the traditional integrated-type school ethos. However, where schools have transformed, not only has it not worked, on a number of occasions, but there have been examples of where the minority community has decreased rather than increased. That is a honest conversation to be had. It is one that I had recently with Integrated AlumNI, when we talked about how we can promote the integrated ethos within our schools. I do not believe that there is any school in Northern Ireland, from any sector, be that Irish-medium, Catholic maintained or controlled, that practises and teaches a segregated approach to its pupils. They are not teaching their children that segregation is a good thing. We need to move the debate away from integrated being regarded as being inclusive and, if you are not integrated, somehow, you are exclusive and the problem. That is not the case.

288 words. Text as published by the Northern Ireland Assembly.

Assessment

Not flagged

Jev’s structured answers met the documented threshold for “not flagged”.

  • Overall probability that the activity is being used to promote, exploit or escalate an identity-based controversy: 0.14 (flagging needs at least 0.70; at or below 0.30 is not flagged).
  • None of the five culture-war criteria was met (each was below 0.60).
  • Assessed as legitimate policy scrutiny (0.71).
  • No identity-based framing was identified (0.66).
  • Subject area: Education structures, integration and community division.
  • The overall probability was at or below the not-flagging threshold.

This is an AI-generated assessment of the text, made against published criteria. It is not a finding of fact about the MLA or their intentions. The Assembly record itself is the fact.

Jev’s structured answers

Probability that each statement is true of this text (0 = no, 1 = yes). A criterion counts as met at 0.60 or above.
QuestionProbabilityMet?
Identity framing0.24No
Sectarian or communal antagonism0.03No
Cultural grievance politics0.06No
Dog-whistle messaging0.07No
Controversy escalation0.10No
Legitimate policy scrutiny0.71Yes
Overall judgement0.14At or below not-flagging threshold
Context and attribution (stance)
OptionProbability
No identity-based framing (chosen)0.66
Reports or questions it0.05
Criticises or condemns it0.29
Adopts it0.00
Subject area (top five)
SubjectProbability
Education structures, integration and community division0.99
Sectarianism, hate crime and community relations0.01
No identity-related subject0.00
Flags, emblems, symbols, names and memorials0.00
Parades, bonfires and commemorations0.00

Assessed 21 October 2026 at 14:13 UTC by jev-1.13.0 (requested as typesafe/jev) under rubric 2026.10-r9, methodology 1.9.

Disagree with this assessment?

Classifications can be challenged. A person reads every challenge, and any change is recorded publicly above with its reason.

Challenge this classification