Debate contribution: Venezuela: Ongoing Political Crisis and International Tensions
Debate contribution by Mr Gerry Carroll on .
- MLA
- Mr Gerry Carroll
- Party at the time
- People Before Profit Alliance
- Date
- 12 January 2026
- Type
- Debate contribution
- Business
- Matter of the Day
- Heading
- Venezuela: Ongoing Political Crisis and International Tensions
- Assembly identifier
- Official Report component 5311176
Read the official Assembly record
Text
It is worth acknowledging the seriousness of the devastating intervention that the United States launched on the people of Caracas almost a week ago, which killed at least 50 people. We know that the United States has a sorry, brutal history of intervention, capture, overthrowing democracy and undermining the wishes of local people across the world, specifically in Latin America. However, what the Trump Administration carried out on 3 January was next-level stuff. We should be absolutely clear on what it was: it was kidnapping. That is what happened on 3 January. It is also worth emphasising that the country of Venezuela posed and poses no risk to the people of the United States or the United States Government. The rules-based international order was always a fabrication, and the United States has always done what it wanted to do, but they did not even pretend to go through the motions when it came to capturing a democratically elected leader. The response from unionist parties in the House is absolutely baffling. Imagine the scenes, the comments and the rightful outcry if Vladimir Putin launched a campaign to kidnap the deputy First Minister of this Administration. Unionist parties would be rightly outraged. They would cry foul and oppose that and rightly so, but, when the US does it, it is, "Work away, lads. Do what you want". It is obscene stuff. Operation Absolute Resolve is classic Yankee imperialism launched by the biggest empire in world history. That empire has been forced to retreat from other parts of the world but thinks that it can intervene in what it calls its "hemisphere".
It is up to the Venezuelan people, as it is the people of any country, to determine their leader, their Government and who rules them. From day 1, the US and the EU hated the project of Chavismo, which, to sum it up, was about limiting the power of multinational corporations and redistributing wealth and resources to poor and indigenous people. The US, the EU and Western Governments detest that — they went so far as to back and finance a coup against Chávez in 2002.
This is not about stopping drugs. Amidst the boats that were captured by the US, 115 people who were working on the seas were killed. It is worth mentioning that the drug charges against Maduro have been dropped. Not a single ounce of drug paraphernalia was found on those boats. That is not to mention Trump's pardoning of the former Honduran president. In a rare moment of honesty, Trump admitted what it is about: oil.
430 words. Text as published by the Northern Ireland Assembly.
Assessment
Jev’s structured answers met the documented threshold for “not flagged”.
- Overall probability that the activity is being used to promote, exploit or escalate an identity-based controversy: 0.29 (flagging needs at least 0.70; at or below 0.30 is not flagged).
- None of the five culture-war criteria was met (each was below 0.60).
- No identity-based framing was identified (0.66).
- The overall probability was at or below the not-flagging threshold.
This is an AI-generated assessment of the text, made against published criteria. It is not a finding of fact about the MLA or their intentions. The Assembly record itself is the fact.
Jev’s structured answers
| Question | Probability | Met? |
|---|---|---|
| Identity framing | 0.26 | No |
| Sectarian or communal antagonism | 0.25 | No |
| Cultural grievance politics | 0.02 | No |
| Dog-whistle messaging | 0.35 | No |
| Controversy escalation | 0.18 | No |
| Legitimate policy scrutiny | 0.17 | No |
| Overall judgement | 0.29 | At or below not-flagging threshold |
| Option | Probability |
|---|---|
| No identity-based framing (chosen) | 0.66 |
| Reports or questions it | 0.00 |
| Criticises or condemns it | 0.07 |
| Adopts it | 0.27 |
| Subject | Probability |
|---|---|
| No identity-related subject | 0.67 |
| Sectarianism, hate crime and community relations | 0.19 |
| Constitutional question, Brexit, the Windsor Framework and sovereignty | 0.06 |
| Another identity-related subject | 0.05 |
| Immigration, asylum, race, ethnicity and Travellers | 0.02 |
Assessed 21 October 2026 at 14:13 UTC by jev-1.13.0 (requested as typesafe/jev) under rubric 2026.10-r9, methodology 1.9.
Disagree with this assessment?
Classifications can be challenged. A person reads every challenge, and any change is recorded publicly above with its reason.