Debate contribution: Interpretation and Translation Service: Costs

Debate contribution by Mr Gerry Carroll on .

MLA
Mr Gerry Carroll
Party at the time
People Before Profit Alliance
Date
2 December 2025
Type
Debate contribution
Business
Oral Answers to Questions
Heading
Interpretation and Translation Service: Costs
Assembly identifier
Official Report component 5272116

Read the official Assembly record

Text

Ag leanúint as ceist Emma,

does the Member agree that the DUP culture war, not wanting to see or hear Irish, needs to come to an end and that we owe a debt of gratitude to our interpreters who, while a small team, do exceptional work for me and other Members across the House? Also, can the Member outline whether the Commission has received any complaints or issues about Pi Comms, which does not employ our interpretation staff, but provides the facilities to allow us to record speeches and items in the Chamber?

93 words. Text as published by the Northern Ireland Assembly.

Assessment

Not flagged

Jev’s structured answers met the documented threshold for “not flagged”.

  • Overall probability that the activity is being used to promote, exploit or escalate an identity-based controversy: 0.35 (flagging needs at least 0.70; at or below 0.30 is not flagged).
  • Criteria met: Cultural grievance politics (0.60).
  • The text criticises or condemns the framing or division (0.66).
  • Subject area: Irish language, Ulster-Scots and language policy.
  • The overall probability was low and the text did not adopt any identity-based framing.

This is an AI-generated assessment of the text, made against published criteria. It is not a finding of fact about the MLA or their intentions. The Assembly record itself is the fact.

Jev’s structured answers

Probability that each statement is true of this text (0 = no, 1 = yes). A criterion counts as met at 0.60 or above.
QuestionProbabilityMet?
Identity framing0.36No
Sectarian or communal antagonism0.27No
Cultural grievance politics0.60Yes
Dog-whistle messaging0.40No
Controversy escalation0.45No
Legitimate policy scrutiny0.44No
Overall judgement0.35Between thresholds
Context and attribution (stance)
OptionProbability
No identity-based framing0.01
Reports or questions it0.01
Criticises or condemns it (chosen)0.66
Adopts it0.32
Subject area (top five)
SubjectProbability
Irish language, Ulster-Scots and language policy1.00
No identity-related subject0.00
Flags, emblems, symbols, names and memorials0.00
Parades, bonfires and commemorations0.00
Sport (including the GAA), the arts and cultural bodies0.00

Assessed 21 October 2026 at 14:07 UTC by jev-1.13.0 (requested as typesafe/jev) under rubric 2026.10-r9, methodology 1.9.

Disagree with this assessment?

Classifications can be challenged. A person reads every challenge, and any change is recorded publicly above with its reason.

Challenge this classification