Debate contribution: Soldier F: Not Guilty Verdict

Debate contribution by Mr Jonathan Buckley on 3 November 2025.

MLA: Mr Jonathan Buckley
Party at the time: Democratic Unionist Party
Date: 3 November 2025
Type: Debate contribution
Business: Matters of the Day
Heading: Soldier F: Not Guilty Verdict
Assembly identifier: Official Report component 5212672

Text

I welcome the not guilty verdict in the case of Soldier F, an elderly veteran who has been put through years of unnecessary turmoil for what can be described only as a show trial. Many years ago, the Public Prosecution Service (PPS) made it clear that the evidence was confused and unreliable and was therefore unlikely ever to result in a prosecution or a conviction. That was not enough for some, however. Those determined to use the courts for political ends pressed on. They pushed for a judicial review (JR) and then went to the Court of Appeal, forcing the PPS to reconsider, and we therefore had the spectacle that many in the republican movement wanted and had long yearned for: a British soldier being brought before the courts.
Whilst I respect the desire and urge for every innocent victim to seek justice and truth for their loved one, we must be honest: this was never an attempt to get to the truth. It was about propaganda, pure and simple; an attempt to rewrite the narrative of the past; an attempt to recast the characters of hero and villain. In the version pushed by the parties opposite, our armed forces, which stood between terrorism and us throughout the Northern Ireland Troubles, were painted as the aggressor, whilst those who planted bombs, pulled triggers and murdered the innocent were portrayed as freedom fighters. Many of them sit in the ranks of the party opposite with the assurance of a letter of comfort from Tony Blair in their back pocket. The evidence in this case was the same confused and contradictory evidence that had already been dismissed, so we must ask this: why did it go back to court in the first instance? Therefore, I say to those, such as Colum Eastwood and members of Sinn Féin, who have championed the process that the enormous public cost, the emotional cost and the damage done to the trust in our judiciary system lies on you. We will never allow the history of the Troubles to be rewritten. We will honour the truth; we will honour their sacrifice; and we will ensure that those who served with dignity —
—have the respect that they deserve.

371 words. Text as published by the Northern Ireland Assembly.

Assessment

Qualifying Legacy of the Troubles, victims and paramilitarism

Jev’s structured answers met every documented threshold for a qualifying culture-war activity.

Overall probability that the activity is being used to promote, exploit or escalate an identity-based controversy: 0.79 (qualifying needs at least 0.70; at or below 0.30 is not qualifying).
Criteria met: Identity framing (0.82); Dog-whistle messaging (0.76).
The text adopts the identity-based framing in its own voice (0.92).
Subject area: Legacy of the Troubles, victims and paramilitarism.
The text adopts an antagonistic or dog-whistle framing, which qualifies even alongside legitimate scrutiny.

This is an AI-generated assessment of the text, made against published criteria. It is not a finding of fact about the MLA or their intentions. The Assembly record itself is the fact.

Jev’s structured answers

Probability that each statement is true of this text (0 = no, 1 = yes). A criterion counts as met at 0.60 or above.
Question	Probability	Met?
Identity framing	0.82	Yes
Sectarian or communal antagonism	0.49	No
Cultural grievance politics	0.22	No
Dog-whistle messaging	0.76	Yes
Controversy escalation	0.49	No
Legitimate policy scrutiny	0.13	No
Overall judgement	0.79	Above qualifying threshold

Context and attribution (stance)
Option	Probability
No identity-based framing	0.06
Reports or questions it	0.00
Criticises or condemns it	0.02
Adopts it (chosen)	0.92

Subject area (top five)
Subject	Probability
Legacy of the Troubles, victims and paramilitarism	0.91
Sectarianism, hate crime and community relations	0.08
Sexism, misogyny, ageism and other equality groups	0.01
No identity-related subject	0.00
Flags, emblems, symbols, names and memorials	0.00

Assessed 21 October 2026 at 13:46 UTC by jev-1.13.0 (requested as typesafe/jev) under rubric 2026.10-r9, methodology 1.9.

Disagree with this assessment?

Classifications can be challenged. A person reviews every challenge, and any change is recorded publicly above with its reason.

Challenge this classification